MESSAGE
| DATE | 2014-12-11 |
| FROM | Ruben
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [LIU Comp Sci] Database Class concepts which are still unclear
|
From owner-learn-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Thu Dec 11 12:57:43 2014
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id 76A22161168; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:57:43 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: learn-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id 58D7716116C; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:57:43 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: learn-at-nylxs.com
Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com (mail-qc0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46560161169
for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:57:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c9so4250523qcz.5
for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:57:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=tGRd8COJ85K8tVZP7f+1xtlOVEQfzbhSFTUZcuWxYfs=;
b=MvXO1rBX0l0eVa9t8p3oFh4027J5j0C9ixDXtbZwBuE0oKzXkjTKEQQgzNA1pU6mRZ
Kf3HxdycBTcWMvQ7dEDl90ZW6kN2UtxL6Bp9k19OqgqsZurjTC2xWrCuDYrJ7G5EFjs7
9/PuhMpES9TJAaNf7EplVtQIaPD0aOp4UuTg4d9FUS1w0egCRWzEs8rKfIZmreSxAlPK
3y2KsDP22FkbAE+6WI08XWs75gOmgyF3ZeBUEOhR5bIHx0mKlNcmYA6z8s+hgho5fd3N
wBEfwtG5a48w6x7/8Jh5icfEZ8Yy+3oDGPryrkgg4tx1oLm007LSTnXmop21Uz2qYVLG
vMHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmI2MNEKT0kCN26VnEP4iFcByUVZiPkp6VXTvqJdtLID66yqYDca9tn659O3WfUHIfSA4mK
X-Received: by 10.229.63.71 with SMTP id a7mr22443521qci.24.1418320659573;
Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.42] ([96.57.23.82])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r12sm29788qax.38.2014.12.11.09.57.38
for
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5489DB18.9000909-at-my.liu.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:57:44 -0500
From: Ruben
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: learn-at-mrbrklyn.com, learn-at-nylxs.com,
Ping-Tsai Chung
Subject: Re: [LIU Comp Sci] Database Class concepts which are still unclear
References: <5489C062.7010909-at-panix.com>
In-Reply-To: <5489C062.7010909-at-panix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-learn-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: learn-at-mrbrklyn.com
Does anyone understand this. The way this is written it is not
comprehendable. The text doesn't flow logically and example, which in
theory is supposed to explain what the text does not, not not explain it
which leave this and "magic logic" - And Blood of a Nwet and Poof, you
get the desired chicken!
<<6.3.4 The DIVISION Operation
The DIVISION operation, denoted by ÷, is useful for a special kind of
query that
sometimes occurs in database applications.>>
Really? What kind?
<< An example is Retrieve the names of employees who work on all the
projects that ‘John Smith’ works on. >>
What class of query is this called and how is it generlized mathmatically.
<>
OK - we will learn by exmple since we have no definitions
<in the intermediate relation
SMITH_PNOS:>>
OK
<SMITH_PNOS ? ?Pno(WORKS_ONEssn=SsnSMITH)>>
OK - that makes sense
<< Next, create a relation that includes a tuple whenever
the employee
whose Ssn is Essn works on the project whose number is Pno in the
intermediate
relation SSN_PNOS:>>
That is a lot of words that make NO SENSE. This sentence doesn't parse
English Gammar in a way that is meaningful, which is interesting since
this is a chapter on Relational Algrabra for which Grammar is a specific
subset and application of.
In other words, I don't think the auther knows what he wrote here and
his editor didn't know enough to fix it or clarify it. But we have an
example:
<>
Fine this MEANS project all the tuples in WORKS_ON by restricting them
to the attributes of Essn and Pno and assign it to a relationship we
call SSN_PNOS
<gives the desired
employees’ Social Security numbers:>>
PRESTO!!! Use this magic symbol and get your desired result!
<>
I have no idea what this does and it hasn't been explained. It is a
waste of my time.
<>
And this says take a natural join of SSNS and EMPLOYEE and project just
the names.
Now dissect the example more closely. Maybe "Presto" will show itself
and a logical contruction.
SSN_PNOS
Essn Pno
123456789 1
123456789 2
666884444 3
453453453 1
453453453 2
333445555 2
333445555 3
333445555 10
333445555 20
999887777 30
999887777 10
987987987 10
987987987 30
987654321 30
987654321 20
888665555 20
SMITH_PNOS
Pno
1
2
SSNS
Ssn
123456789
453453453
Magic Results, no explanation. This is the kind of soft material that
litters this class everywhere. I don't understand it and until you can
explain it, I'm not convinced you understand it either.
On 12/11/2014 11:03 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> 6.2.2 The CARTESIAN PRODUCT (CROSS PRODUCT)
> Operation
> Next, we discuss the CARTESIAN PRODUCT operation—also known as CROSS
> PRODUCT or CROSS JOIN—which is denoted by ×. This is also a binary set
> opera-
> tion, but the relations on which it is applied do not have to be union
> compatible. In
> its binary form, this set operation produces a new element by combining
> every
> member (tuple) from one relation (set) with every member (tuple) from
> the other
> relation (set). In general, the result of R(A1, A2, ..., An) × S(B1, B2,
> ..., Bm) is a rela-
> tion Q with degree n + m attributes Q(A1, A2, ..., An, B1, B2, ..., Bm),
> in that order.
> The resulting relation Q has one tuple for each combination of
> tuples—one from R
> and one from S. Hence, if R has nR tuples (denoted as |R| = nR), and S
> has nS tuples,
> then R × S will have nR * nS tuples.
> The n-ary CARTESIAN PRODUCT operation is an extension of the above concept,
> which produces new tuples by concatenating all possible combinations of
> tuples
> from n underlying relations.
>
>
> What is an n-ary operation? It is mentioned several times, but I don't
> see an answer
>
> Ruben
>
|
|
