MESSAGE
| DATE | 2023-05-14 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] (fwd) Re: Human & ape evolution
|
-- forwarded message --
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4725:b0:74d:f683:8ce5 with SMTP id bs37-20020a05620a472500b0074df6838ce5mr6761143qkb.2.1683863155423;
Thu, 11 May 2023 20:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:bb82:0:b0:394:5693:6679 with SMTP id
l124-20020acabb82000000b0039456936679mr811409oif.2.1683863154121; Thu, 11 May
2023 20:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Path: reader2.panix.com!panix!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 20:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:445b:981d:7489:59e8;
posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:445b:981d:7489:59e8
References:
<8e10d592-fd89-48be-846f-21bd43922082n-at-googlegroups.com> <7b2d4a90-bec8-41e5-8e10-fe6f25d1d150n-at-googlegroups.com>
<5be288b9-a8ed-49e4-80b1-4563bad242den-at-googlegroups.com> <87b9826e-0b3f-4395-94fa-74ab3b586edbn-at-googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <274baa09-ffe2-4cfc-a98f-f51a33790227n-at-googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Human & ape evolution
From: JTEM
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 03:45:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2964
Xref: panix sci.bio.paleontology:77297
Peter Nyikos wrote:
> You have so many views on so many things, and they are so under-supported,
What are you pretending is the better supported model?
And I do mean "Model."
Aquatic Ape is a model that fits the evidence and makes predictions. What
you do have to offer that competes with it?
How and why were Homo in China more than 2 million years ago if our
ancestors were evolving on an African savanna?
How did we evolve such a need for DHA PRIOR to any genetic adaptation
that allows us to synthesize it as well as we do -- which isn't great -- when
your claimed environment is near devoid of the stuff?
Bipedalism predates the LCA by a strong margin. How did adapting to
the forest lead to evolving AWAY from bipedalism when you now claim
it is where & how bipedalism arose in the first place?
> JTEM is running away
You are a severely mentally ill troll. We're looking at numerous
personality disorders here, starting with D.I.D.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/717065307257176065
-- end of forwarded message --
_______________________________________________
Hangout mailing list
Hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://lists.mrbrklyn.com/mailman/listinfo/hangout
|
|
