MESSAGE
| DATE | 2023-05-14 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] (fwd) Re: Human & ape evolution
|
-- forwarded message --
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4f09:0:b0:61a:c43f:ce29 with SMTP id fb9-20020ad44f09000000b0061ac43fce29mr3745053qvb.5.1683838484359;
Thu, 11 May 2023 13:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:f307:0:b0:390:974f:e81f with SMTP id
r7-20020acaf307000000b00390974fe81fmr2306243oih.11.1683838484074; Thu, 11 May
2023 13:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
Path: reader2.panix.com!panix!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 13:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <41b099ee-67fb-499b-9514-21f699c033ccn-at-googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:ad50:5e6c:2c98:b876;
posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:ad50:5e6c:2c98:b876
References:
<8e10d592-fd89-48be-846f-21bd43922082n-at-googlegroups.com> <7b2d4a90-bec8-41e5-8e10-fe6f25d1d150n-at-googlegroups.com>
<099e5d27-6abb-475c-aa3d-6bed2704d4afn-at-googlegroups.com> <0a4516e7-e6ad-4ee5-b622-89d5ac0774e1n-at-googlegroups.com>
<69590e91-5746-41d1-9799-7c601c0b0ac4n-at-googlegroups.com> <6dc7b585-69c6-4d82-a1ca-b9c247033b7an-at-googlegroups.com>
<41b099ee-67fb-499b-9514-21f699c033ccn-at-googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <31c936f2-3bee-4d65-98ca-4db92fd20ad4n-at-googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Human & ape evolution
From: JTEM
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 20:54:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 3326
Xref: panix sci.bio.paleontology:77289
oot...-at-hot.ee wrote:
> Wiki is source of reliable references
No it's not. No half-decent high school teacher would accept Wiki
as a reference. It's simply NOT a reference.
> > No. You're "arguing" that savanna idiocy is so stupid nobody believes
> > in it, or ever believed in it, and that the good Doctor is wrong for
> > saying that it's idiocy.
> Misrepresentation.
No. You have nothing to say here, no rebuttal, so instead you're being
an idiot and acting out.
The good doctor says the savanna thing is idiocy, you insist that he's
right, it's so idiotic that nobody believes in it, and that the good Doctor
is wrong.
> I'm arguing that majority of people
You never took a poll.
On the other hand, generations were spoon fed savanna idiocy.
> > Stop it. If you want to pretend you're not obfuscating, make a counter
> > proposal.
> What is the point?
You clearly want to disagree with the good Doctor so make a counter
proposal.
> Lot of animals and birds use tools and construct buildings.
No. That's projecting humans -- actions and motives -- onto animals.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/717051628437585920
-- end of forwarded message --
_______________________________________________
Hangout mailing list
Hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://lists.mrbrklyn.com/mailman/listinfo/hangout
|
|
