MESSAGE
| DATE | 2023-05-14 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] (fwd) Re: Human & ape evolution
|
-- forwarded message --
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2892:b0:754:f607:7e2 with SMTP id j18-20020a05620a289200b00754f60707e2mr7122394qkp.6.1683932593027;
Fri, 12 May 2023 16:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:6284:0:b0:394:45f7:8067 with SMTP id
w126-20020aca6284000000b0039445f78067mr2112827oib.1.1683932592520; Fri, 12
May 2023 16:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Path: reader2.panix.com!panix!1.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 16:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <45a94c34-cab6-4a5d-bac8-61254f0d2769n-at-googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:a03f:8dee:f400:a8a0:f171:2faf:ba38;
posting-account=od9E6wkAAADQ0Qm7G0889JKn_DjHJ-bA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:a03f:8dee:f400:a8a0:f171:2faf:ba38
References:
<3945b9af-47a1-449f-8d8f-cfe629f1e309n-at-googlegroups.com> <4703fe06-af83-4e68-98a7-ac15d74555a0n-at-googlegroups.com>
<865e8403-d6ac-47fa-8a36-947acfe9aaacn-at-googlegroups.com> <89df092d-0858-4714-99c3-f5ebfa805975n-at-googlegroups.com>
<45a94c34-cab6-4a5d-bac8-61254f0d2769n-at-googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID:
Subject: Re: Human & ape evolution
From: marc verhaegen
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 23:03:13 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2907
Xref: panix sci.bio.paleontology:77304
me:
> > > > > > 4 frequent paleo-anthropological prejudices, with 0 evidence:
> > > > > > Many PAs still *assume* that human ancestors
> > > > > > 1) became bipedal when we left the trees for the gound??
> > > > > > 2) came Out-of-Africa (OoA)??
> > > > > > 3) were savanna-dwellers???
somebody uninformed:
> > > > > That is not that popular hypothesis. You typically use it as straw man.
> > > > > Found remains show indications that our ancestors were still well
> > > > > adapted to climbing trees, even after they had begun to walk upright.
me:
> > > > of course:
> > > > https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
imbecile:
> > > You *are* parroting there groundless H.P. Lowecraft fan-fiction by from two human generations ago. Back then it
> > > was "purely hypothetical" because of gap in fossil record and methods for
> > > sequencing genes were still under development. Right now it is clearly kook
> > > theory that is contradicting with all our evidence. ...
:-DDD *your* evidence!! :-DDD
same imbecile:
> It started from African woodland apes. We see Pre-Oldowan woodland ape
> tools in Africa from 3.3 mya.
"we"see?? :-DDD
Even if so, my little little boy, never heard of chimp tool use??
Grow up:
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
-- end of forwarded message --
_______________________________________________
Hangout mailing list
Hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://lists.mrbrklyn.com/mailman/listinfo/hangout
|
|
