MESSAGE
| DATE | 2023-05-14 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] (fwd) Re: Human & ape evolution
|
-- forwarded message --
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1a28:b0:759:247d:74fa with SMTP id bk40-20020a05620a1a2800b00759247d74famr623146qkb.3.1683923394111;
Fri, 12 May 2023 13:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:f386:0:b0:390:7b13:f6c3 with SMTP id
r128-20020acaf386000000b003907b13f6c3mr3013953oih.6.1683923393867; Fri, 12
May 2023 13:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: reader2.panix.com!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 13:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <89df092d-0858-4714-99c3-f5ebfa805975n-at-googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=145.14.47.111; posting-account=pysjKgkAAACLegAdYDFznkqjgx_7vlUK
NNTP-Posting-Host: 145.14.47.111
References:
<3945b9af-47a1-449f-8d8f-cfe629f1e309n-at-googlegroups.com> <4703fe06-af83-4e68-98a7-ac15d74555a0n-at-googlegroups.com>
<865e8403-d6ac-47fa-8a36-947acfe9aaacn-at-googlegroups.com> <89df092d-0858-4714-99c3-f5ebfa805975n-at-googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <45a94c34-cab6-4a5d-bac8-61254f0d2769n-at-googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Human & ape evolution
From: "oot...-at-hot.ee"
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 20:29:54 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 3272
Xref: panix sci.bio.paleontology:77303
On Friday, 12 May 2023 at 23:04:41 UTC+3, marc verhaegen wrote:
> me:
> > > > > 4 frequent paleo-anthropological prejudices, with 0 evidence:
> > > > > Many PAs still *assume* that human ancestors
> > > > > 1) became bipedal when we left the trees for the gound??
> > > > > 2) came Out-of-Africa (OoA)??
> > > > > 3) were savanna-dwellers???
> somebody uninformed:
> > > > That is not that popular hypothesis. You typically use it as straw man.
> > > > Found remains show indications that our ancestors were still well
> > > > adapted to climbing trees, even after they had begun to walk upright.
> me:
> > > of course:
> > > https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
>
> imbecile:
> > You *are* parroting there groundless H.P. Lowecraft fan-fiction by from two human generations ago. Back then it
> > was "purely hypothetical" because of gap in fossil record and methods for
> > sequencing genes were still under development. Right now it is clearly kook
> > theory that is contradicting with all our evidence. ...
>
Yes you are parroting there what Alister Hardy and Elaine Morgan wrote.
> :-DDD *your* evidence!! :-DDD
The current scientific evidence of outside of your imaginary kook universe is is that,
let me restore:
It started from African woodland apes. We see Pre-Oldowan woodland ape
tools in Africa from 3.3 mya.
Oldowan tools (and butchered hippos) in Africa from 2.9 mya. Oldowan
tools elsewhere are all after 2 mya so some homo spread out with those.
The later Acheulean tools we see similarly starting from 1.76 mya East
Africa and then spreading to elsewhere slowly between 1.5 mya to 0.8
mya.
So all Mode I and Mode II "technology" came from Africa and spread slowly
elsewhere. Also everything indicates that inventors preferred eating medium
to large game to harvesting seashores.
-- end of forwarded message --
_______________________________________________
Hangout mailing list
Hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://lists.mrbrklyn.com/mailman/listinfo/hangout
|
|
