MESSAGE
| DATE | 2021-01-03 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] researched facts wrapped in a ball of paranoia
|
Anyone see this?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-2020-worldwide-corona-crisis-destroying-civil-society-engineered-economic-depression-global-coup-detat-and-the-great-reset/5730652
It is well researched and seemingly touches all the check marks. But
there are some significant cracks, not the least is the overall
reasoning. It deserves critique but much of its points are valid
globalresearch.ca
The 2020 Worldwide Corona Crisis: Destroying Civil Society, Engineered
Economic Depression, Global Coup d'État and the "Great Reset" - Global
Research
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
151-192 minutes
Preface
The fear campaign has served as an instrument of disinformation.
In the course of the last eleven months starting in early January, I
have analyzed almost on a daily basis the timeline and evolution of the
Covid crisis. From the very outset in January 2020, people were led to
believe and accept the existence of a rapidly progressing and dangerous
epidemic.
Media lies sustained the image of a killer virus which initially
contributed to destabilizing US-China trade and disrupting air travel.
And then in February “V- the Virus” (which incidentally is similar to
seasonal influenza) was held responsible for triggering the most serious
financial crisis in World history.
And then on March 11, a lockdown was imposed on 193 member states on the
United Nations, leading to the “closure” of national economies Worldwide.
Starting in October, a “second wave” was announced. “The pandemic is
not over”.
The fear campaign prevails. And people are now led to believe that the
corona vaccine sponsored by their governments is the “solution”. And
that “normality” will be restored once the entire population of the
planet has been vaccinated.
The SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
How is it that a vaccine for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which under normal
conditions would take years to develop, was promptly launched in early
November 2020? The mRNA vaccine announced by Pfizer is based on an
experimental gene editing mRNA technology which has a bearing on the
human genome.
Were the standard animal lab tests using mice or ferrets conducted?
Or did Pfizer “go straight to human “guinea pigs.”? Human tests began in
late July and early August. “Three months is unheard of for testing a
new vaccine. Several years is the norm.”
Our thanks to Large and JIPÉM
This caricature by Large + JIPÉM explains our predicament:
Mouse No 1: “Are You Going to get Vaccinated”,
Mouse No. 2: Are You Crazy, They Haven’t finished the Tests on Humans”
And why do we need a vaccine for Covid-19 when both the WHO and the US
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have confirmed
unequivocally that Covid-19 is “similar to seasonal influenza”.
The plan to develop a vaccine is profit driven. It is supported by
corrupt governments serving the interests of Big Pharma. The US
government had already ordered 100 million doses back in July and the EU
is to purchase 300 million doses. It’s Big Money for Big Pharma,
generous payoffs to corrupt politicians, at the expense of tax payers.
In the following chapters, we define the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the
controversial RT-PCR test which is being used to “identify the virus” as
well establish the “estimates” of the so-called “positive
cases”.(Chapter II)
In Chapter III, we examine in detail the timeline of events since
October 2019 leading up to the historic March 11, 2020 lockdown.
We assess the broad economic and social consequences of this crisis
including the process of Worldwide impoverishment and redistribution of
wealth in favour of the Super Rich billionaires.(Chapter IV and V)
Big Pharma’s vaccination programme which is slated to be imposed on
millions of people Worldwide is reviewed in Chapter VII.
Chapter IX concludes with an analysis of the World Economic Forum’s
proposed “Great Reset” which if adopted would consist in scrapping the
Welfare State and imposing massive austerity measures on an impoverished
population.
This E-Book is preliminary. There is a sense of urgency. People
Worldwide are being lied to by their governments.
A word on the methodology: our objective is to refute the “Big Lie”
through careful analysis consisting of:
A historical overview of the Covid crisis,
Scientific analysis and detailed review of “official” data,
estimates and definitions,
Analysis of the impacts of WHO “guidelines” and government policies
on economic, social and public health variables.
Our objective is to inform people Worldwide and refute the official
narrative which has been used as a pretext and justification to
destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries.
This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: 7.8 billion people. We
stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings Worldwide. Truth is a
powerful instrument.
I remain indebted to our readers and to the Global Research team.
Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, December 11, 2020
(revised on December 15, December 21, January 2, 2021)
Spread the word. Please forward this text to friends and colleagues
Copyright: Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). December 2020.
The preface and Introductory chapter can be crossposted with a link to
the complete E-book. If you wish to use or reproduce the text of the
E-Book or sections thereof, kindly contact Michel Chossudovsky at
crgeditor-at-yahoo.com
About the Author
Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics
(emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the
Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal, Editor of Global
Research.
He has undertaken field research in Latin America, Asia, the Middle
East, sub-Saharan Africa and the Pacific and has written extensively on
the economies of developing countries with a focus on poverty and social
inequality. He has also undertaken research in Health Economics (UN
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), UNFPA,
CIDA, WHO, Government of Venezuela, John Hopkins International Journal
of Health Services (1979, 1983)
He is the author of eleven books including The Globalization of Poverty
and The New World Order (2003), America’s “War on Terrorism” (2005),
The Globalization of War, America’s Long War against Humanity (2015).
He is a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. His writings have
been published in more than twenty languages. In 2014, he was awarded
the Gold Medal for Merit of the Republic of Serbia for his writings on
NATO’s war of aggression against Yugoslavia. He can be reached at
crgeditor-at-yahoo.com
See Michel Chossudovsky, Biographical Note
Michel Chossudovsky’s Articles on Global Research
Chapter I.
Introduction. Destroying Civil Society. The Fear Campaign
Chapter II
What Is Covid-19, SARS-2 : How Is It Tested? How Is It Measured?
Chapter III
The Corona Timeline
Chapter IV
Engineered Economic Depression
Chapter V
The Enrichment of the Super Rich. The Appropriation and Redistribution
of Wealth
Chapter VI
“There Is No Cure”. Suppression of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), A Cheap
and Effective Drug
Chapter VII
Big Pharma’s Covid Vaccine
Chapter VIII
Freedom of Expression. Categorizing The Protest Movement as “Anti-Social”
Chapter IX
“Global Coup d’État” and the “Great Reset”. Global Debt and Neoliberal
“Shock Treatment”
.
.
“It is time for everyone to come out of this negative trance, this
collective hysteria, because famine, poverty, mass unemployment will
kill and destroy the lives of many more people than SARS-CoV-2! ” (Dr.
Pascal Sacré)
“I’m seeing patients that have facial rashes, fungal infections,
bacterial infections. … In February and March we were told not to wear
masks. What changed? The science didn’t change. The politics did. This
is about compliance. It’s not about science… (Dr. James Meehan)
“Once the Lie Becomes the Truth, there is No Moving Backwards. Insanity
prevails. The world is turned upside down.” (Michel Chossudovsky)
***
We are at the crossroads of one of the most serious crises in World
history. We are living history, yet our understanding of the sequence of
events since January 2020 has been blurred. Worldwide, people have been
misled both by their governments and the media as to the causes and
devastating consequences of the Covid-19 “pandemic”.
The unspoken truth is that the novel coronavirus provides a pretext and
a justification to powerful financial interests and corrupt politicians
to precipitate the entire World into a spiral of mass unemployment,
bankruptcy, extreme poverty and despair.
This is the true picture of what is happening. It is the result of a
complex decision-making process.
“Planet Lockdown” is an encroachment on civil liberties and the “Right
to Life”.
Entire national economies are in jeopardy. In some countries martial
law has been declared.
Small and medium sized capital are slated to be eliminated. Big capital
prevails.
A massive concentration of corporate wealth is ongoing.
Its a diabolical “New World Order” in the making.
Red Zones, the facemask, social distancing, the closing down of schools,
colleges and universities, no more family gatherings, no birthday
celebrations, music, the arts: no more cultural events, sport events are
suspended, no more weddings, “love and life” is banned outright.
And in several countries, Christmas reunions are illegal.
Closing down the Global Economy is presented to us as a means to
combating the Virus. That’s what they want us to believe. If the public
had been informed that Covid-19 is “similar to seasonal Influenza”, the
fear campaign would have fallen flat…
Image Pakistan Daily Times: Trainee Santas in UK
The Pandemic was officially launched by the WHO on March 11, 2020
leading to the Lockdown and closure of the national economies of 190
(out of 193) countries, member states of the United Nations. The
instructions came from above, from Wall Street, the World Economic Forum
(WEF), the billionaire foundations.
The March 11, 2020 pandemic was preceded by a WHO Public Health
Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on January 30th, 2020 which
was followed in February by the destabilization of financial markets. On
January 30th there were 83 cases outside China out of a total population
of 6.4 billion. In the days preceding the February Financial Crash there
were 453 cases outside China. (See our analysis in Chapter II)
This diabolical project based on scanty and flawed estimates is casually
described by the corporate media as a “humanitarian” endeavour. The
“international community” has a “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P).
In the words of Diana Johnstone, it’s “The Global Pretext”. An unelected
“public-private partnership” under the auspices of the World Economic
Forum (WEF), has come to the rescue of Planet Earth’s 7.8 billion
people. The closure of the global economy is presented as a means to
“killing the virus”.
Sounds absurd. Closing down the real economy of Planet Earth is not the
“solution” but rather the “cause” of a diabolical process of Worldwide
destabilization and impoverishment.
The national economy combined with political, social and cultural
institutions is the basis for the “reproduction of real life”: income,
employment, production, trade, infrastructure, social services.
Destabilizing the economy of Planet Earth cannot constitute a “solution”
to combating the virus. But that is the imposed “solution” which they
want us to believe in. And that is what they are doing.
It’s the destruction of people’s lives. It is the destabilization of
civil society.
The Lies are sustained by a massive media disinformation campaign. 24/7,
Incessant and Repetitive “Covid alerts” for the last eleven months. … It
is a process of social engineering.
What they want is to hike up the numbers so as to justify the Lockdown.
And now there is a so-called “Second Wave”. Millions of covid-Positive
Tests are now being tabulated.
Covid-19 is portrayed as the “killer Virus”.
Destroying Civil Society
People are frightened and puzzled. “Why would they do this?”
Empty schools, Empty airports, bankrupt grocery stores.
In France “Churches are threatened with Kalashnikovs over Covid-19
outbreak” (April 2020)
The entire urban services economy is in crisis. Shops, bars and
restaurants are driven into bankruptcy. International travel and
holidays are suspended. Streets are empty. In several countries, bars
and restaurants are required to take names and contact information to
support effective contact tracing if necessary.
.
Free Speech is Suppressed
The lockdown narrative is supported by media disinformation, online
censorship, social engineering and the fear campaign.
Medical doctors who question the official narrative are threatened. They
loose their jobs. Their careers are destroyed. Those who oppose the
government lockdown are categorized as “anti-social psychopaths”:
Peer reviewed psychological “studies” are currently being carried in
several countries using sample surveys.
Accept the “big Lie” and you are tagged as a “good person” with
“empathy” who understands the feelings of others.
…[E]xpress reservations regarding … social distancing and the wearing
of the face mask, and you will be tagged (according to “scientific
opinion”) as a “callous and deceitful psychopath”.
In colleges and universities, the teaching staff is pressured to conform
and endorse the official covid narrative. Questioning the legitimacy of
the lockdown in online “classrooms” could lead to dismissal.
Several medical doctors who oppose the COVID consensus or the vaccine
have been arrested. In December, “Jean-Bernard Fourtillan, a retired
university professor known for his opposition to the COVID-19 vaccine
was arrested “by law enforcement officers under military command, and
forcibly placed in solitary confinement at the psychiatric hospital of
Uzès.” Fourtillan is known as “longtime critic of vaccines that use
dangerous adjuvants”.
Screen Shot: NTD, December 16, 2020
Google and Twitter Marketing the Big Lie
The opinions of prominent scientists who question the lockdown, the
face-mask or social distancing are “taken down” by Google:
“YouTube doesn’t allow content that spreads medical misinformation that
contradicts the World Health Organization (WHO) or local health
authorities‘ medical information about COVID-19, including on methods to
prevent, treat or diagnose COVID-19, and means of transmission of
COVID-19.” (emphasis added) They call it “fact checking”, without
acknowledging that both the WHO and local health authorities contradict
their own data and concepts.
.
Similarly, Twitter has confirmed that “it will remove all posts that
suggest there are ‘adverse impacts or effects of receiving
vaccinations’… Twitter will: “memory-hole any posts that “invoke a
deliberate conspiracy” or “advance harmful, false, or misleading
narratives’ about vaccines.”
March 11, 2020: Engineered Economic Depression. Global Coup d’Etat?
Destabilizing in one fell swoop the national economies of more 190
countries is an act of “economic warfare”. This diabolical agenda
undermines the sovereignty of nation states. It impoverishes people
Worldwide. It leads to a spiralling dollar denominated global debt.
The powerful structures of global capitalism, Big Money coupled with its
intelligence and military apparatus are the driving force. Using
advanced digital and communications technologies, the Lockdown and
Economic Closure of the global economy is unprecedented in World history.
This simultaneous intervention in 190 countries derogates democracy. It
undermines the sovereignty of nation states Worldwide, without the need
for military intervention. It is an advanced system of economic
warfare which overshadows other forms of warfare including conventional
(Iraq-style) theater wars. (See Chapters IV, IX)
“Global Governance” Scenarios. World Government in the Post-Covid Era?
The March 11 2020 Lockdown project uses lies and deception to ultimately
impose a Worldwide totalitarian regime, entitled “Global Governance” (by
unelected officials). In the words of David Rockefeller:
“…The world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a
world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite
and world bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” (quoted by Aspen Times,
August 15, 2011, emphasis added)
The Global Governance scenario imposes an agenda of social engineering
and economic compliance:
“It constitutes an extension of the neoliberal policy framework imposed
on both developing and developed countries. It consists in scrapping
“national auto-determination” and constructing a Worldwide nexus of
pro-US proxy regimes controlled by a “supranational sovereignty” (World
Government) composed of leading financial institutions, billionaires and
their philanthropic foundations.”(See Michel Chossudovsky, Global
Capitalism, “World Government” and the Corona Crisis, May 1, 2020).
Simulating Pandemics
The Rockefeller Foundation proposes the use of “scenario planning” as a
means to carry out “global governance”. (For further details, see Michel
Chossudovsky, May 1, 2020). In the Rockefeller’s 2010 Report entitled
“Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
Area” scenarios of Global Governance and the actions to be taken in the
case of a Worldwide pandemic are contemplated.
More specifically, the report envisaged (p 18) the simulation of a Lock
Step scenario including a global virulent influenza strain. The 2010
Rockefeller report was published in the immediate wake of the 2009 H1N1
swine flu pandemic.
Another important simulation was carried out on October 18, 2019, less
than 3 months before SARS-2 was “officially” identified in early January
2020.
Event 201 was held under the auspices of the Johns Hopkins Center for
Health Security, sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and
the World Economic Forum. (For details see Michel Chossudovsky, March 1,
2020)
Intelligence and “The Art of Deception”
The Covid crisis is a sophisticated instrument of the power elites. It
has all the features of a carefully planned intelligence op. using
“deception and counter-deception”. Leo Strauss: “viewed intelligence as
a means for policymakers to attain and justify policy goals, not to
describe the realities of the world.” And that is precisely what they
are doing in relation to Covid-19.
Video: The Event 201 Pandemic Exercise. October 18, 2019. Focusses on
the extent of the pandemic. Also addresses within the simulation how to
deal with online social media and so-called “misinformation”. (Listen
carefully)
Confirmed by prominent scientists as well as by official public health
bodies including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the US Center
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Covid-19 is a public health
concern but it is NOT a dangerous virus.
.
“The Global Pretext”
.
The COVID-19 crisis is marked by a public health “emergency” under WHO
auspices which is being used as a pretext and a justification to
trigger a Worldwide process of economic, social and political
restructuring. The tendency is towards the imposition of a totalitarian
State.
Social engineering is being applied. Governments are pressured into
extending the lockdown, despite its devastating economic and social
consequences.
There is no scientific basis for implementing the closing down of the
global economy as a means to resolving a public health crisis. Both the
media and the governments are involved in spreading disinformation.
The fear campaign has no scientific basis. Your governments are LYING.
In fact they are lying to themselves.
.
.
Chapter II
What Is Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2
How Is It Tested? How Is It Measured?
Are we dealing with a dangerous virus. Is it a pandemic?
The fear campaign is relentlessly spearheaded by political statements
and media disinformation. A closer examination of official reports from
national health authorities as well as peer reviewed articles provides a
totally different picture.
SARS-CoV-2 is not a Killer Virus.
According to an early report by the WHO pertaining to China’s epidemic:
The most commonly reported symptoms [of COVID-19] included fever,
dry cough, and shortness of breath, and most patients (80%) experienced
mild illness. Approximately 14% experienced severe disease and 5% were
critically ill. Early reports suggest that illness severity is
associated with age (>60 years old) and co-morbid disease. (largely
basing on WHO’s assessment of COVID-19 in China)
Screenshot The Hill, March 19, 2020
What is Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2.
Lies through omission: the media has failed to reassure the broader
public. Below is the official WHO definition of Covid-19:
Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses which may cause illness in
animals or humans. In humans, several coronaviruses are known to cause
respiratory infections ranging from the common cold to more severe
diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe
Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). The most recently discovered
coronavirus causes coronavirus disease COVID-19.
The most common symptoms of COVID-19 are fever, dry cough, and
tiredness. … These symptoms are usually mild and begin gradually. Some
people become infected but only have very mild symptoms. Most people
(about 80%) recover from the disease without needing hospital treatment.
Around 1 out of every 5 people who gets COVID-19 becomes seriously ill
and develops difficulty breathing.
“COVID-19 is similar to SARS-1″: According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg,
pneumonia is “regularly caused or accompanied by corona viruses”.
Immunologists broadly confirm the CDC definition. COVID-19 has similar
features to a seasonal influenza coupled with pneumonia.
According to Anthony Fauci (Head of NIAID), H. Clifford Lane and Robert
R. Redfield (Head of CDC) in the New England Journal of Medicine
…the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more
akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality
rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in
1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have
had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.
Dr. Anthony Fauci is lying to himself. In his public statements he says
that Covid is “Ten Times Worse than Seasonal Flu”.
He refutes his peer reviewed report quoted above. From the outset, Fauci
has been instrumental in waging the fear and panic campaign across America:
Screenshot The Hill, March 19, 2020
Covid-19 versus Influenza (Flu) Virus A and Virus B (and subtypes) (Bear
in mind seasonal influenza is not a coronavirus)
Rarely mentioned by the media or by politicians: The CDC (which is an
agency of the US government) confirms that Covid-19 is similar to Influenza
“Influenza (Flu) and COVID-19 are both contagious respiratory illnesses,
but they are caused by different viruses. COVID-19 is caused by
infection with a new coronavirus (called SARS-CoV-2) and flu is caused
by infection with influenza viruses. Because some of the symptoms of flu
and COVID-19 are similar, it may be hard to tell the difference between
them based on symptoms alone, and testing may be needed to help confirm
a diagnosis. Flu and COVID-19 share many characteristics, but there are
some key differences between the two.”
If the public had been informed and reassured that Covid is “similar to
Influenza”, the fear campaign would have fallen flat.
The lockdown and closure of the national economy would have been
rejected outright.
Detecting the Virus. Estimating and Tabulating the Numbers. The Reverse
Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Test (RT-PCR)
The standard test used to “detect / identify” SARS-2 around the World is
The Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Test (RT-PCR).
The PCR-RT test has been used to estimate and tabulate the number of
so-called “confirmed” positive Covid-19 cases. (This is not the only
test used. Observations below pertain solely to the standard PCR test).
According to Nobel Laureate Dr. Kary Mullis who invented the RT-PCR
test. (Dr. Mullis wrote, on May 7, 2013):
PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a
virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the
somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of
the amplified fragment.”
The PCR-RT developed by Dr. Kary Mullis has been applied in an
erroneous way with a view to “estimating” SARS-2 positive cases, in most
cases without a medical diagnosis of the patient.
(See our observations below on the Drosten RT-PCR Study. As emphasized
by Dr. Mullis and confirmed by prominent medical doctors, the PCR test
does not “identify the virus”).
Below are the concepts developed by the CDC.
The Test for Covid-19 “Confirmed Cases”
Below are the official definitions and procedures which are contradictory:
“The COVID-19 RT-PCR test is a real-time reverse transcription
polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test for the qualitative detection
of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2 in upper and lower respiratory specimens
… collected from individuals suspected of COVID 19 … [as well as] from
individuals without symptoms or other reasons to suspect COVID-19
infection. …
This test is also for use with individual nasal swab specimens that are
self-collected using the Pixel by LabCorp COVID-19 test home collection
kit … The COVID-19 RT-PCR test is also for the qualitative detection of
nucleic acid from the SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples, using a matrix
pooling strategy (FDA, LabCorp Laboratory Test Number: 139900)
This test is based on upper and lower respiratory specimens.
The criteria and guidelines confirmed by the CDC pertaining to “The
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Diagnostic Panel” are as follows
(Read carefully):
Results are for the identification of 2019-nCoV RNA. The 2019-nCoV RNA
is generally detectable in upper and lower respiratory specimens during
infection. Positive results are indicative of active infection with
2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with
other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of
disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are
required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health
authorities.
Negative results do not preclude 2019-nCoV infection and should not be
used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management
decisions. Negative results must be combined with clinical observations,
patient history, and epidemiological information.
What this suggests is that a positive infection could be the result of
co-infection with other viruses. According to the CDC it “does not rule
out “bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent
detected may not be the definite cause of disease.” (CDC)
The following diagram summarizes the process of identifying positive and
negative cases: All that is required is the presence of “viral genetic
material” for it to be categorized as “positive”. The procedure does not
identity or isolate Covid-19. What appears in the tests are fragments of
the virus.
A positive test does not mean that you have the virus and/or that you
could transmit the virus.
.
A negative test does not mean that you do not have it.
.
The CDC concepts cited above suggest that the PCR as applied to estimate
the spread of the virus– is dysfunctional. Moreover, amplification in
excess of 25 cycles will inevitably result in misleading estimates.
.
What the governments want is to inflate the number of positive cases.
Presumptive vs. Confirmed Cases
.
In the US, the CDC data include both “confirmed” and “presumptive”
positive cases of COVID-19 reported to CDC or tested under the
jurisdiction by CDC since January 21, 2020.
The presumptive positive data does not confirm coronavirus infection:
Presumptive testing involves “chemical analysis of a sample that
establishes the possibility that a substance is present“ (emphasis
added). The presumptive test must then be sent for confirmation to an
accredited government health lab. (For further details see: Michel
Chossudovsky, Spinning Fear and Panic Across America. Analysis of
COVID-19 Data, March 20, 2020)
Similarly in Canada, “A point-of-care test” is a “rapid test done at the
time and place of care, such as a hospital or doctor’s office”. It
consists in collecting “samples from the nose or throat using swabs”,
which are then tested on site, with almost immediate results (in 30 to
60 minutes). But it does not confirm the presence of SARS-CoV-2.
Serological testing or Antibody Tests for COVID-19
According to the CDC, Serological tests do not detect the virus itself,
“they detect the antibodies produced in response to an infection.”
Serological tests are not used for “early diagnosis of COVID-19.”
“False Positives” and the Identification of the Virus. The PCR Test does
not Identify SAR-CoV-2
While SARS-CoV-2 –namely the the virus which is said to cause COVID-19
(categorized as a disease), was isolated in a laboratory test in January
2020, the RT-PCR test does not identify/ detect the virus. What it
detects are fragments of viri. According to renowned Swiss immunologist
Dr B. Stadler
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus
that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The
test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts
of the virus left. Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona
test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a
tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].
The Question is Positive for What?? The PCR test does not detect the
identity of the virus, According to Dr. Pascal Sacré,
these tests detect viral particles, genetic sequences, not the whole virus.
In an attempt to quantify the viral load, these sequences are then
amplified several times through numerous complex steps that are subject
to errors, sterility errors and contamination.
Positive RT-PCR is not synonymous with COVID-19 disease! PCR specialists
make it clear that a test must always be compared with the clinical
record of the patient being tested, with the patient’s state of health
to confirm its value [reliability]
The media frighten everyone with new positive PCR tests, without any
nuance or context, wrongly assimilating this information with a second
wave of COVID-19.
While the RT-PCR test was never intended to identify the virus, it
nonetheless constitutes from the very outset the cornerstone of the
official estimates of Covid-19 “positives”.
WHY then was it adopted??
The Controversial Drosten RT-PCR Study
F. William Engdahl in a recent article documents how the RT-PCR Test was
instated by the WHO at the outset, despite its obvious shortcomings in
identifying the 2019-nCoV. The scandal takes its roots in Germany
involving “a professor at the heart of Angela Merkel’s corona advisory
group”:
On January 23, 2020, in the scientific journal Eurosurveillance, of the
EU Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Dr. Christian Drosten,
along with several colleagues from the Berlin Virology Institute at
Charité Hospital, [together] with the head of a small Berlin biotech
company, TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, published a study entitled,
“Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR”
(Eurosurveillance January 23, 2020).
While Drosten et al’s Eurosurveillance article (undertaken in liaison
with the WHO) confirmed that “several viral genome sequences had been
released”, in the case of 2019-nCoV, however, “virus isolates or samples
from infected patients were not available … “:
“The genome sequences suggest presence of a virus closely related to the
members of a viral species termed severe acute respiratory syndrome
(SARS)-related CoV, a species defined by the agent of the 2002/03
outbreak of SARS in humans [3,4].
We report on the the establishment and validation of a diagnostic
workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation [using the
RT-PCR test], designed in absence of available virus isolates or
original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the
close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of
synthetic nucleic acid technology.” (Eurosurveillance, January 23,
2020, emphasis added).
What this (erroneous) statement suggests is that the identity of
2019-nCoV was not required and that “validation” would be enabled by
“the close genetic relatedness to the 2003-SARS-CoV.”
The recommendations of the Drosten study (supported by the Gates
Foundation) pertaining to the use of the RT-PCR test applied to
2019-nCoV were then transmitted to the WHO. They were subsequently
endorsed by the Director General of the WHO, Tedros Adhanom. The
identity of the virus was not required.
The above also explains the subsequent renaming by the WHO of the
2019-nCoV to SARS-CoV-2.
The Drosten et al article pertaining to the use of the RT-PCR test
Worldwide (under WHO guidance) was challenged in a November 27, 2020
study by a group of 23 international virologists, microbiologists et
al. “Their careful analysis of the original [Drosten] piece is damning.
…They accuse Drosten and cohorts of “fatal” scientific incompetence and
flaws in promoting their test” (Engdahl, December, 2020):
In light of all the consequences resulting from this very publication
for societies worldwide, a group of independent researchers performed a
point-by-point review of the aforesaid publication [Drosten] in which 1)
all components of the presented test design were cross checked, 2) the
RT-qPCR protocol-recommendations were assessed w.r.t. good laboratory
practice, and 3) parameters examined against relevant scientific
literature covering the field.
The published RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of
2019-nCoV and the manuscript suffer from numerous technical and
scientific errors, including insufficient primer design, a problematic
and insufficient RT-qPCR protocol, and the absence of an accurate test
validation. Neither the presented test nor the manuscript itself fulfils
the requirements for an acceptable scientific publication. Further,
serious conflicts of interest of the authors are not mentioned. Finally,
the very short timescale between submission and acceptance of the
publication (24 hours) signifies that a systematic peer review process
was either not performed here, or of problematic poor quality. We
provide compelling evidence of several scientific inadequacies, errors
and flaws. (November 27, 2020 Critique of Drosten article, emphasis added)
The results of the PCR Test applied to SARS-2 are blatantly flawed. At
the time of writing (Second Wave) the test is being used extensively to
hike up the numbers with a view to justifying a partial lockdown with
devastating social and economic impacts including the engineered
bankruptcy of tourism, air travel and the urban services economy. (See
Chapters IV and V)
The RT-PCR Test. CDC “Estimates” of So-called Covid-19 “Positive Cases”.
How is the Data Tabulated?
Below is a screen shot of the CDC form entitled Human Infection with
2019 Novel Coronavirus Case Report Form to be filled in by authorized
medical/ health personnel
Note the categorization, bearing in mind that neither the “Probable
Case” nor the (RT-PCR) “Lab-confirmed case” are “confirmed”. Moreover,
there is no way to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus in a PCR lab test (as
stated above).
In the US, the probable (PC) and the lab confirmed cases (CC) are lumped
together. And the total number (PC + CC ) constitutes the basis for
establishing the data for COVID-19 infection. It’s like adding apples
and oranges.
The total figure (PC+CC) categorized as “Total cases” is meaningless. It
does not measure positive COVID-19 Infection.
Most of the presumptive tests are undertaken by private clinics or
commercial clinics.
In the UK, according to a Daily Telegraph May 21 report: “samples taken
from the same patient are being recorded as two separate tests in the
Government’s official figures”.
This is only one example of data manipulation.
In the US, clinics are paid ($$$) to hike up the number of Covid-19
admissions. A probable case does not require a lab exam: “Meets vital
records criteria with no confirmatory lab testing” (see form above)
COVID-19 Recovery Rates
The CDC Data tabulates both “confirmed” and “presumptive” positive
cases since January 21, 2020. Yet what it fails to make public is that
among the confirmed and presumptive cases, a large number of Americans
have recovered. But nobody talks about recovery. It does not make the
headlines.
The Falsification of Death Certificates in the U.S.
At the outset of the pandemic, the CDC had been instructed to change the
methodology regarding Death Certificates with a view to artificially
inflating the numbers of “Covid deaths”. According to H. Ealy, M.
McEvoy et al
“The 2003 guidelines for establishing death certificates had been
cancelled. “Had the CDC used its industry standard, Medical Examiners’
and Coroners’ Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting
Revision 2003, as it has for all other causes of death for the last 17
years, the COVID-19 fatality count would be approximately 90.2% lower
than it currently is.” (Covid-19: Questionable Policies, Manipulated
Rules of Data Collection and Reporting. Is It Safe for Students to
Return to School? By H. Ealy, M. McEvoy, and et al., August 09, 2020
CDC Deaths Attributed to COVID-19. Comorbidities
The latest CDC report confirms that 94% of the deaths attributed to
Covid have “comorbidities”,(i.e. deaths dues other causes).
For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths
with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there
were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death. The number of deaths
with each condition or cause is shown for all deaths and by age groups.
On March 21, 2020 the following specific guidelines were introduced by
the CDC regarding Death Certificates (and their tabulation in the
National Vital Statistics System (NVSS)
COVID-19: The “underlying cause of death”
Will COVID-19 be the underlying cause of death? This concept is
fundamental. The underlying cause of death is defined by the WHO as “the
disease or injury that initiated the train of events leading directly to
death”.
What the CDC is recommending with regards to statistical coding and
categorization is that COVID-19 is expected to be the underlying cause
of death “more often than not.”
“What Happens if Certifiers Report Terms other than the Suggested
Term?”(see below)
The Certifier is not allowed to report coronavirus without identifying a
specific strain. And the guideline recommends that COVID-19 be
indicated, when in fact the nature of the PCR test does not isolate the
SARS-CoV-2 virus. (2019 coronavirus strain).
(see below): (source CDC)
Will COVID-19 be the underlying cause of death?
“The underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are
reported on the death certificate. However, the rules for coding and
selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in
COVID- 19 being the underlying cause more often than not.”
“What happens if certifiers report terms other than the suggested terms?
If a death certificate reports coronavirus without identifying a
specific strain or explicitly specifying that it is not COVID-19, NCHS
will ask the states to follow up to verify whether or not the
coronavirus was COVID-19.
As long as the phrase used indicates the 2019 coronavirus strain, NCHS
expects to assign the new code. However, it is preferable and more
straightforward for certifiers to use the standard terminology (COVID-19).
What happens if the terms reported on the death certificate indicate
uncertainty?
If the death certificate reports terms such as “probable COVID-19” or
“likely COVID-19,” these terms would be assigned the new ICD code. It Is
not likely that NCHS will follow up on these cases.
If “pending COVID-19 testing” is reported on the death certificate,
this would be considered a pending record. In this scenario, NCHS would
expect to receive an updated record, since the code will likely result
in R99. In this case, NCHS will ask the states to follow up to verify if
test results confirmed that the decedent had COVID- 19.
… COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents
where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to
death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on
their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.”
The CDC’s “More Often than Not” Clause Falsifies the Cause of Death?
These specific guidelines have indelibly contributed to increasing
Covid-19 as the recorded “cause of death”
And this despite the fact that the use of RT-PCR test provides
misleading results.
Video
Test, Test, Test
The RT-PCR Test is known to produce a high percentage of false
positives. People are frightened. They are encouraged to do the PCR
test, which increases the number of fake positives. And governments are
currently involved in increasing the number of PCR tests with a view to
inflating the number of so-called Covid-19 positive cases.
But a PCR positive does not confirm a Covid-19 positive.
These inflated Covid positive “estimates” (from the PCR test) are then
tabulated and used to sustain the fear campaign. The hype in Covid-19
deaths is based on flawed and biased criteria.
According to Dr. Pascal Sacré in an article entitled: The COVID-19
RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down
Society: .
This misuse of RT-PCR technique is used as a relentless and intentional
strategy by some governments, supported by scientific safety councils
and by the dominant media, to justify excessive measures such as the
violation of a large number of constitutional rights, the destruction of
the economy with the bankruptcy of entire active sectors of society, the
degradation of living conditions for a large number of ordinary
citizens, under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive
RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.
The RT- PCR tests do not prove infection:
“Today, as authorities test more people, there are bound to be more
positive RT-PCR tests. This does not mean that COVID-19 is coming back,
or that the epidemic is moving in waves. There are more people being
tested, that’s all.”
This procedure of massive data collection is there to provide supportive
(faulty) “estimates” to justify the existence of so-called “Second
Wave”, not to mention the devastating economic and social consequences.
(See Chapters IV and IX)
.
.
Chapter III
The Corona Timeline
September 19, 2019: The ID2020 Alliance held their Summit in New York,
entitled “Rising to the Good ID Challenge”. The focus was on the
establishment of a vaccine with an embedded digital passport.
October 18, 2019. The 201 Pandemic Simulation Exercise
The coronavirus was initially named 2019-nCoV by the WHO, the same name
as that adopted at the October 18, 2019 201 Simulation exercise under
the auspices of the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Health, Centre for
Heath Security (an event sponsored by the Gates Foundation and World
Economic Forum).(Event 201)
In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted
a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 with partners, the World
Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. … For the
scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly
stated that it was not a prediction.
Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response
challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. We are not
now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people.
Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus,
the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional
virus are not similar to nCoV-2019.“We are not now predicting that the
nCoV-2019 [which was also used as the name of the simulation] outbreak
will kill 65 million people.
.Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus,
the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional
virus are not similar to nCoV-2019.”
December 31, 2019: First cases of pneumonia detected and reported in
Wuhan, Hubei Province. China.
January 1, 2020: Chinese health authorities close the Huanan Seafood
Wholesale Market after Western media reports that wild animals sold
there may have been the source of the virus. This initial assessment was
subsequently refuted by Chinese scientists.
January 7, 2020: Chinese authorities “identify a new type of virus”
which was isolated on 7 January. The coronavirus was named 2019-nCoV by
the WHO exactly the same name (with the exception of the placement of
the date) as that adopted in the WEF-Gates-John Hopkins October 18, 2019
simulation exercise.
January 11, 2020 – The Wuhan Municipal Health Commission announces the
first death caused by the coronavirus.
January 22, 2020: WHO. Members of the WHO Emergency Committee “expressed
divergent views on whether this event constitutes a PHEIC or not”. The
Committee meeting was reconvened on January 23, 2020, overlapping with
the World Economic Forum meetings in Davos (January 21-24, 2020).
The meeting of the Emergency Committee convened by the WHO
Director-General under the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005)
expressed divergent views on whether this event constitutes a PHEIC or
not. At that time, the advice was that the event did not constitute a
PHEIC, but the Committee members agreed on the urgency of the situation
and suggested that the Committee should be reconvened in a matter of
days to examine the situation further.
January 21-24, 2020: Consultations at the World Economic Forum, Davos,
Switzerland under auspices of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness
Innovations (CEPI) for development of a vaccine program. CEPI is a
WEF-Gates partnership. With support from CEPI, Seattle based Moderna
will manufacture an mRNA vaccine against 2019-nCoV, “The Vaccine
Research Center (VRC) of the National Institute of A |
|
