MESSAGE
| DATE | 2017-06-11 |
| FROM | Rick Moen
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Abbott Scam
|
Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com):
> On 06/11/2017 01:58 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 08:15:37PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> >> Quoting Ruben Safir (ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com):
> >>
> >>> Abbott Pharmacuetics is giving kickback to healthcare insurance
> >>> companies to mandate that Pharmacies must use their lifestyle diabetic
> >>> testing supplies. This is thanks to Obama care.
> >>
> >> If Abbott Pharmaceuticals is engaging in corruption, it should get
> >> prosecuted for that. Please provide your evidence to both this mailing
> >> list and state prosecutors. Thank you.
>
> It is fucking corrupt to give insurance companies kickbacks and then
> shake down healthcare providers, mostly pharmacists, so that they have
> to pay you for the privileged to provide healthcare for patients.
I can't help noticing that you nowhere address what I said, providing
zero of the requested evidence. Perhaps this is because 'Please provide
your evidence to both this mailing list and state prosecutors' is the
rational thing to do, but you cannot do it. Just as you have no answer
to any of my other points, and I was wasting my time attempting to
assume you were willing to stop and think.
Ah well. I notice that, even though you cannot address a simple and
obvious explanation, that doesn't stop you from -- as usual --
attempting to simply out-should everyone else, with a string of _six_
new messages where you reply to yourself repeatedly, starting with the
one I'm replying to:
6 N 170610 Ruben Safir (116) ,->Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Abbott Sca
7 N 170610 Ruben Safir ( 23) |->
8 N 170610 Ruben Safir (175) ,->
9 N 170610 Ruben Safir (321) |->
10 N 170610 Ruben Safir (200) |->
11 N 170610 Ruben Safir ( 56) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Abbott Scam
You know, Ruben, you aren't paying me to process your logorrhea, so in
this case I'm going to just skip it. If you wish to not be ignored
going forward, try getting your point across without attempting to cover
the mailing list with a blizzard of dialogues with yourself.
> If you say, one more time, that just because something is legal that
> it is not corruption and immoral, I'll kick you off the list and
> terminate the friendship.
Excuse me? I have never said that obviously wrong thing at any point,
past or present -- and I would appreciate your immediate, public apology
for claiming I did.
I'll be charitable and assume you are having cognition problems, as the
alternative would be to assume libel.
> I don't care WHY you think this kind of racketeering is legal.
I did not assert or imply that, either. i will expect a _second_ apology
for your assertion to the contrary.
_______________________________________________
Hangout mailing list
Hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://www.nylxs.com/mailman/listinfo/hangout
|
|
