MESSAGE
| DATE | 2016-11-01 |
| FROM | ruth02@web.de
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] ...'Who,
|
Von: "Rick Moen" An: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Betreff: [Hangout-NYLXS] Meanwhile, in the land of 'Who, me?'
[1]http://www.newsweek.com/2016/11/11/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-
emails-documents-515120.html
Donald Trump has a long, troubling history of destroying and hiding
important documents in lawsuits....
Seems a bit pessimistic, actually. I'm sure the next President will
work out, no matter who she is.
_______________________________________________
hangout mailing list
hangout-at-nylxs.com
[2]http://www.nylxs.com/
**************************************
Rick, it me Ruth again ! Will send you my pic soon and tell you who I
am...
Ruben met friends of me in NY... but now to clear
cross-circuits from your synapses:
However bad Trump's flaws and warts may be, they pale in comparison to
what Hellary is.
PS: "Snopes" has already been discredited as a reliable reference
source- any doubts, let me know, I will send you the link.
===============
Hillary for 'Dummies' (a word to the wise)
Exclusive: Top 10 facts that disqualify Clinton for president + Top 7
Charges Hillary Clinton Could Face While President
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________
By now, we all know that FBI Director James Comey has announced his
agency has reopened its investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails,
just 11 days before the election.
Knowing that she and other high-ranking Democrats are pressuring
Comey, and also knowing that Comey has already failed to properly
investigate Hillary, it's certainly possible that the FBI director
could cave.
And there's no doubt the Democrats will unleash hell in a last-ditch
effort to derail Trump.
Therefore, it would be wise for voters to resist allowing their minds
to be whiplashed by the news cycle and consider what they already know
about Hillary Rodham Clinton:
1) Consider why there is an email scandal to begin with. Hillary
chose to run her official government communications through a private
server in her basement. Why would she do this, other than to escape
scrutiny? Seeing the damning WikiLeaks releases confirms any
suspicions.
2) A threat to national security: As secretary of state, Hillary
and her team exposed highly classified information to our enemies. FBI
Director Comey himself described her as "extremely careless." Hillary
deleted 33,000 emails after she received a subpoena to turn them over.
Her team destroyed Blackberry phones and cleaned her devices with
BleachBit to prevent investigators from retrieving the data. We all
know the only reason Hillary is not in jail now is because she is being
protected - up until now by FBI higher-ups and Obama's "Justice"
Department, led by Loretta Lynch, who was a litigation partner for
eight years at a major Washington law firm, Hogan & Hartson LLP, that
did tax work for the Clintons.
3) She is corrupt: Hillary claimed that she and Bill were "dead
broke" when they left the White House, yet today the Clinton's net
worth is an estimated $111 million! They've never operated a business
nor manufactured a single product, so how did these career politicians
amass a fortune? By peddling her influence as secretary of state and
selling access to the White House.
In 2010, governments and aid groups pledged $10 billion for Haiti's
earthquake recovery. The Clintons helped themselves by exploiting the
Haitian earthquake to give favors to influential donors. There has been
little reconstruction in Port-au-Prince. Under Hillary's watch, the
State Department cannot account for $6 billion in contracting money.
Hillary also gave $165 billion worth of arms sales to 20 nations that
had donated to the Clinton Foundation.
4) Disastrous policies: Hillary supports sanctuary cites. She has
promised to use executive orders to implement amnesty and strict gun
control. Hillary plans to allow 550% more Syrian refugees into the
U.S.! She was author of the failed universal health-care plan in 1993.
Hillary advocated early withdrawal from Iraq and called for U.S.
involvement in Libya. Both nations have become training grounds for
Islamic terrorists.
5) A "congenital liar": In 1996, New York Times columnist William
Safire labeled Hillary a "congenital liar." Hillary proved this label
to be accurate when she denied sending or receiving classified
information from her private server, when she blamed the Benghazi
terrorist attacks on spontaneous protests over a video, when WikiLeaks
exposed her private support for open borders, when she claimed she
landed under sniper fire in Bosnia and so on.
6) Hillary is sick: She collapsed leaving a 9/11 memorial last
month. She suffers from severe coughing spells. She's been described as
"often confused" by top aide Huma Abedin. She's reportedly had three
blood clots since 1998. She fainted and sustained a concussion in 2012.
Hillary's media can't hide everything!
7) She's a race-baiter: Hillary embraces the hate-filled rhetoric
of Black Lives Matter and makes excuses for violence against police.
She was the first to suggest that Obama may not have been born in the
U.S., and she said Obama wasn't a Muslim "as far as I know" (wink,
wink!). She's praised the late Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (a former KKK
recruiter) as a mentor and friend.
8) A nasty woman: Hillary has viciously attacked her sexual
predator husband's victims as "bimbos." She laughed about getting her
client off after he raped a young girl. She called Gold Star parent
Patricia Smith (mother of Sean Smith, killed in Benghazi) a liar. And
Hillary infamously called millions of Trump supporters a "basket of
deplorables" and even "irredeemable."
9) Hillary is just not likable: Oprah Winfrey recently acknowledged
that people don't like Hillary and had to remind viewers, "She is not
coming over to your house! You don't have to like her." Some
endorsement!
10) She hasn't accomplished anything: Hillary rode her husband's
coattails to get to the top. She has experience in government, but as
Donald Trump said, it's bad experience.
So in the coming days, don't be deceived by potentially kind words from
FBI Director Comey toward Hillary, or by the corrupt media. Be strong
in what you know, and tell all your sensible friends to vote. What we
already know about Hillary should be more than enough to disqualify her
from serving a term - at least as president!
++++++++++++++++++++++
Note: Join Jesse Lee Peterson for a special election town hall forum
Tuesday, Nov. 1 at 7 p.m. (6146 West Pico Blvd., Los Angeles,
California 90035). Admission is FREE. RSVP here.
Hey Rick M: this forum is on the left coast- good for you, you can
scoot down to LA for it ! -yours, Ruth
++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________________________________
__
Top 7 Charges Hillary Clinton Will Face by John Hayward 31 Oct
2016
What scandals might the American people find themselves dealing with in
Hillary Clinton's Administration if she slides into the presidential
home plate, trailing a cloud of controversy?
Let us be honest about who suffers from presidential misbehavior--it's
the American people who pay the price, including the literal price of
the expensive investigations. The odds of justice actually catching up
with Hillary Clinton dwindle to almost zero if she gains the White
House. She might have to sacrifice an aide here and there, but if the
political system of 1998 couldn't remove her husband from office for
blatant perjury, it's hard to imagine what could possibly bring The
First Woman President down in the even more corrupt and confused
political system of 2017.
That being said, here are a few lingering legal headaches Clinton could
face:
1. Perjury: Why not start with a blast from the Clinton past? Hillary
Clinton signed documents testifying that she turned over all
work-related emails to the State Department, on orders from a federal
judge, under penalty of perjury. We already have indisputable proof she
violated this sworn statement... thousands of times.
The cloud of false statements under oath surrounding Hillary Clinton is
thousands of times thicker than the one around Bill. Democrats seem to
have found a hidden clause in the Constitution that says Clintons can
never be prosecuted for perjury, but Madame Secretary is really
stress-testing that particular privilege of Clintonhood. One would
think the federal judiciary had some interest in establishing that
sworn documents must be taken seriously.
2. Obstruction of Justice: Bill Clinton's primary motive for committing
perjury was to obstruct justice--it was the second count in his
impeachment. (The justice he was obstructing was a sexual harassment
suit from Paula Jones, at a time when liberals insisted sexual
harassment was the most overlooked, under-prosecuted crime in the legal
code.)
Hillary's thousands of perjury counts are also related to the
obstruction of justice. She held back documents she didn't want
Congress to see. She subverted the Freedom of Information Act, which is
a law, not a lovely suggestion.
Most media timelines of the Clinton email scandal are either incomplete
or deliberately obtuse, because they almost never accurately relate how
her secret server was discovered. For example, these timelines from USA
Today, CNN, and ABC News all get it wrong.
Sharyl Attkisson, who was a participant in the story, has an accurate
timeline that makes the important point Clinton-friendly media outlets
don't want to talk about: we know about the secret server because the
State Department was sued for failing to respond to FOIA requests. The
State Department's official story is that they were surprised to
discover Clinton was withholding thousands of documents on her private
computer.
That's straight-up obstruction of justice, in cases involving multiple
federal courts, as surely as Bill Clinton's impeachable offense of
obstructing the Paula Jones suit. Clinton may become untouchable if the
American people allow her into the White House, but the lawsuits don't
evaporate, and neither do the angry judges.
3. Bribery: After the FBI set off a headline earthquake by re-opening
the Clinton email investigation, we learned that several other FBI
investigations of Clintonworld have been quietly in progress for some
time. One of those investigations is digging into bribery allegations
against the Clinton Foundation. The FBI agents working on these cases
were reportedly very angry that top Bureau and Justice Department
officials were pressuring them to drop their investigations.
The most attention-grabbing of these suspicions concerns an FBI
official, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife received an
inexplicably huge political donation from Clinton bagman Terry
McAuliffe, currently the governor of Virginia. The timing of this
donation was so convenient that even the Left side of the blogosphere
has produced some uneasy speculation that McCabe probably should have
recused himself from all things Clinton-related.
Well, he didn't recuse himself, and the conflicts of interest are so
apparent that the lack of a chiseled-in-stone quid pro quo might not be
enough to kill this case off. After all, corrupt officials aren't
usually dumb enough to write down their quid pro quo agreements, or
repeat them into microphones. The McCabe controversy already has longer
legs than most observers expected, when the news first broke.
4. Pay for Play: There has also been recent confirmation that the FBI
has investigated influence-peddling allegations against the Clinton
Foundation, which was so obviously used for that purpose that it's
funny to watch Clinton apologists insist nothing can be proven in a
court of law. Some of the most vigorous infighting within the Bureau
reportedly concerns whether pay-for-play investigations should move
forward.
WikiLeaks has exposed emails from Clinton insiders that openly discuss
how the Foundation was part of a network that steered millions of
dollars to "Bill Clinton Inc." Even longtime members of the Clinton
syndicate professed themselves troubled by these operations. They were
also unhappy with arrangements like Hillary Clinton's agreement to
speak in Morocco after a $12 million donation to the Clinton Global
Initiative.
It's entirely possible that more documentation about these suspicious
Clinton Foundation dealings will come to light after the election,
especially if some of the people Clinton took money from grow upset
with her. It's downright dangerous to have a President with so many
strings attached.
5. Illegal Use of a Nonprofit Organization: There are many laws
governing the management of charitable organizations, generally
intended to prevent them from becoming money-laundering operations,
ripoff operations, and vehicles for political influence peddling. The
Clinton Foundation and its galaxy of related operations may eventually
find itself answering some questions about compliance with those laws,
assuming the IRS decides to stop focusing its efforts on hassling
mom-and-pop pro-life groups and kitchen-table Tea Party outfits. If the
Foundation is ever held to account for any other impropriety, charges
of abusing a nonprofit should be part of the legal package as well.
6. Racketeering: Former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy has recently
observed that Hillary Clinton's abuse of the State Department looks an
awful lot like a "racketeering enterprise," which could trigger the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1971, more widely
known as RICO. McCarthy explained:
Under RICO, an "enterprise" can be any association of people,
informal or formal, illegitimate or legitimate - it could be a Mafia
family, an ostensibly charitable foundation, or a department of
government. It is a racketeering enterprise if its affairs are
conducted through "a pattern of racketeering activity." A "pattern"
means merely two or more violations of federal or state law; these
violations constitute "racketeering activity" if they are included
among the extensive list of felonies laid out in the statute.
7. Fraud: Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel has been building a case
that the "Clinton Charity Network," as he calls the complete system of
Clinton operations, has committed "charity fraud of epic proportions."
In part, he refers to discrepancies between donor accounts and the
Clinton Foundation's books.
Others have pointed out how the Clinton Health Access Initiative has
essentially ignored New York state law for years, without a peep from
Attorney General Eric Schneiderman (who just happens to be part of the
Clinton campaign's "leadership council.") There are some interesting
differences between the paperwork CHAI submitted to the IRS and what it
submitted to the state of New York, which has more specific
requirements about identifying foreign donors.
In addition to getting a free pass on perjury, the Clintons are
traditionally allowed to violate tax laws without penalty, eventually
refiling paperwork when "errors" are discovered years after the fact.
Another round of whoops-my-bad, no-harm-no-foul "refiling" during a
Hillary Clinton presidency would be embarrassing, especially if she's
busy trying to ratchet up taxes on everyone else.
References
1. http://www.newsweek.com/2016/11/11/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-emails-documents-515120.html
2. http://www.nylxs.com/
_______________________________________________
hangout mailing list
hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://www.nylxs.com/
|
|
