MESSAGE
| DATE | 2015-03-18 |
| FROM | Ruben
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Apple crimes
|
On 03/18/2015 02:40 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 01:37 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
>> Quoting prmarino1-at-gmail.com (prmarino1-at-gmail.com):
>>
>>> We were essentially saying the same thing I just dumbed it down.?
>>> Essentially once it is included in the upstream project with any
>>> additional modifications it becomes a new whole piece of software.
>> But with more owners. (Technically, no, it is not a 'whole new piece of
>> software'. In legal terms, it is a derivative work. Which please see.)
>>
>>> So in a sense both now hold an individual copyright on the code;
>>> however you are quite wrong on the assertion that people don't give
>>> away the rights to their code.
>> Cite controlling law, please. I did. You, by contrast, are merely
>> asserting I (and the Copyright Act, which I cited) are mistaken without
>> stating any reason, let alone the damned impressive one required to
>> overrule primary Federal statute law. Kindly state your legal authority.
>>
>>> In fact it happens all the time with open source software due to
>>> submission agreements most people don't read.
>> Example, please?
> http://www.mrbrklyn.com/images/los_angeles_2014/IMG_3553.JPG
>
>
http://www.mrbrklyn.com/images/los_angeles_2014/IMG_3505.JPG
|
|
