MESSAGE
| DATE | 2012-03-06 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Fwd: Charter Issues
|
On 03/06/2012 01:16 AM, Ron Guerin wrote:
> Ruben Safir wrote:
>> On 03/05/2012 11:50 PM, Ron Guerin wrote:
>>> You know very well that at this point,
>>> anything I think is a good thing, they're ideologically opposed to. So
>>> really, my being there could only impede the process.
>>>
>>
>> Un FUcking BELIEVABLE
> I get that you want me there. But there is absolutely no point to it.
Yes there is
> Any charter that didn't terminate the membership status of most of the
> members and that doesn't leave the Gang deciding who gets to be one is
> never going to be accepted.
No - your wrong
> The trotting out of the lawyer and the
> constant bringing up of one made that very clear.
>
The lawyer isn't a majority vote
> You want to pretend you're dealing with decent people with good
> intentions, that's up to you. If this is your way of establishing in a
> "proof" sense that they won't do the right thing, this is just asking
> too much of everyone, yourself included. It's too high a price to pay.
>
I'm not pretending anything. If anything I'm pretending to be of help
to people like you, What an IDIOT I am.
> I am reminded of the wise words of Ruth Shanen who said the correct
> thing to do in situations like this is form a new group. Ruth surely
> wasn't thinking of heists when she said that, but the essential wisdom
> remains. You can't save NYLUG from the people who've already forever
> tarnished its reputation, and I think it's expecting too much of Aaron
> to expect him to refuse to turn the domains over to them. I have heard
> from enough people now to know that the next step is going to be be when
> some of those people form a new group. Trying to get dishonorable
> people to behave honorably is a waste of resources.
>
> - Ron
|
|
