MESSAGE
| DATE | 2011-06-05 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] (fwd) Re: Anonymous namespace
|
-- forwarded message --
Path: reader1.panix.com!panix!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!postnews.google.com!h9g2000yqk.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: gwowen
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Anonymous namespace
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <03464db0-e118-463c-9834-171dab457e42-at-h9g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
References:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.105.29.244
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1307088488 24504 127.0.0.1 (3 Jun 2011 08:08:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse-at-google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:08:08 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse-at-google.com
Injection-Info: h9g2000yqk.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.105.29.244; posting-account=QcRbKAoAAADM1CebbVtgwo1TZrfQ-Ch_
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 INNISA01
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: VCUHALSRNK
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Xref: panix comp.lang.c++:1085957
On Jun 3, 3:54=A0am, r...-at-zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote:
> >What is the point of the anonymous namespace.
>
> =A0 Names can be hidden from the linker (from other translation
> =A0 units), even if they should have external linkage.
Can someone give the benefits of external-but-unlinkable anon-
namespace variables (or functions) against old-school internal linkage
file-scope "static" variables and functions.
-- end of forwarded message --
|
|
