MESSAGE
DATE | 2010-01-01 |
FROM | Ruben Safir
|
SUBJECT | Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] mysql issues
|
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:41:59 -0500 From: Ruben Safir To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Cc: rms-at-fsf.org, ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com Subject: Help save MySQL; Sign the petition User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 01:16:21PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote: > > Ruben Safir wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 04:39:38AM -0500, Ron Guerin wrote: > > > >> Ruben Safir wrote: > >> > >>> I just don't know what to make of this. Monty emailed me this today and > >>> sent a private message. > >>> I'd like to here some opinions on this, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> My recollection is that the FSF has come out against this position. > >> You might also want to look this over: > >> http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20091208104422384 > >> > >> > > > > > > What is YOUR opinion > > My opinion, is largely based on the fact that MySQL didn't become Free > Software until VA Linux handed them a check for a million dollars. I > think Monty was never really on board with us, and Larry Augustin's > money is long ago spent. I suspect he's had a case of seller's remorse > now that he can't dual-license MySQL code anymore so now he's trying to > dump the GPL. >
I think this issue is complex. Monty is no doubt not a die in the wool Free Software advocate. We had him as an NYLXS award winner years ago and the amount of effort that he put into free software support for MYSQL was herculinian (sp?) so I do believe that he has deep Free Software scrupples, but he definitely percieves of his economic interest in an ability to dual license, and more importantly, he seems to have business contacts that strongly believe in the need to obtain closed sources licensing. Its just kind of funny for me to read that Larry paid Monty to put MYSQL under the GPL because I think Monty is a far greater Free Software advocate than Larry.
I think there are a couple of things driving this and one aspect of this which needs to be understood. First, when Monty sold the TM and original copyrights to MYSQL to Sun, I think part of his calculation was that ***HE IS MYSQL***, so nothing he was doing was going to really affect his long turm relationship with his work...as long as his relationship with Sun Microsystems remained cordial. He doesn't have that relationship with Oracle. In fact, I'm sure he was spent a good part of his life skirmishing with Ellison's mega-giant..and there is a lot of bad blood. And now his business contacts are gathering around him trying to leverage as much as possible long term control of MYSQL.
I don't think Monty is really thinking about this clearly. The GPL is the biggest thing that protects him. In they remove that protection Oracle is going to swallow up MYSQL like Apple has Darwin
Note what happened here:
http://store.psystar.com/
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&ct2=us%2F0_0_s_0_2_aa&usg=AFQjCNFaj35V8sV0pinZcr_B8ZSKW2JQbw&cid=17593682345270&ei=Bz8-S-jyBuOYlQe7-sj0AQ&rt=SEARCH&vm=STANDARD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.osnews.com%2Fstory%2F22668%2FPsystar_Switches_to_Linux_Temporarily_Halts_Sales_of_Rebel_EFI
http://www.osnews.com/story/22668/Psystar_Switches_to_Linux_Temporarily_Halts_Sales_of_Rebel_EFI
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Apple/?p=5544
Secondly, What was Monty thinking? Sun has been in economic turmoil for a decade. He's had been better off buying Sun then selling to them? Once he sold that trademark to them, he was playing Russian Rollette with his lifes work. So why did he sell? Because Sun made him a BILLIONAIRE. I was so happy for him. He is getting older in years and he worked his ass off in the most generous possible way and then he finally got a HUGE pay day..one that he absolutely earned and deserved. He did everything right, IMO and dealt with everyone fairly. Oracle can NEVER match the technical back ground and the customer support, the community support, that Monty has for over a decade. The man is a one man army..the single most involved individual I'd ever seen in tech community. He is a template and icon of community help and resources. Go look at the MYSQL website archives. He's answered questions from me and EVERYONE ELSE ON THE GLOBE about MYSQL from the C code base, to PHP trivialies, newbies and the most advanced users alike, since at least 1996. Your going to buy a MYSQL support license, who are you going to buy it from, Oracle or Monty. This is a no brainer.
Let him fork under the GPL. He's not losing any money and removing the GPL from MYSQL is a dangerous game, IMO.
Lastly, I'm not in agreement of his interpretation of the GPL, although I'm double checking with Richard. Who says you can't build proprietary apps on top of Free Software without extra legal clauses?
Ruben
-- http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://fairuse.nylxs.com DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
"Yeah - I write Free Software...so SUE ME"
"The tremendous problem we face is that we are becoming sharecroppers to our own cultural heritage -- we need the ability to participate in our own society."
"> I'm an engineer. I choose the best tool for the job, politics be damned.< You must be a stupid engineer then, because politcs and technology have been attached at the hip since the 1st dynasty in Ancient Egypt. I guess you missed that one."
? Copyright for the Digital Millennium
|
|