MESSAGE
DATE | 2009-07-30 |
FROM | Ruben Safir
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Moving ISP Services
|
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:32:10PM -0400, Ron Guerin wrote: > Amy Coleman wrote: > > Verizon is more exspensive than Comcast (to compare). Verizon wanted 60 > > more than comcast for services. I've also heard bad things about verizon > > as well. > > > > No need to tell us Verizon is evil. We know all about it. Comcast is > too. And what would you expect? Verizon continues to reap the > benefits of its formerly government sponsored monopoly, and cable > franchising isn't exactly a free market either. So if you can even get > the pathetic excuses for what's peddled as broadband in America, you > have to choose which arm of the sleazy government coddled duopoly to > deal with. > > - Ron
Well, we are in for a rocky week because I've got to covert everything to new IP addresses and to make it fun, I tested the Cable/Cisco set up and it failed.
First - I have to get mrbrklyn.com, nylxs.com, nylxs.org, freedom-it.com, freedom-it.org and brooklyn-living.com all rereistered to the new IP addresses. I have to reconfigure bind and the named.conf file, and then I have to kick the hell out of this lousy cisco router.
You'd think I never handled networks before the way this thing crapped out out.
In theory the subnet is 36.57.23.80 on a mask of 255.255.255.248
The gateway, which I assumed to be the router is 36.57.23.81
Then we have 36.57.23.82 -3 -4 -5 -6 for usable IP space. But when I set 36.57.23.82 for the servers outbound ethernet card with a gateway... the damn 36.57.23.81 was unreachable. If anyone knows anything about these crapy cisco routers, I can use the help
You'd think I never done this about a thousand times before.
ruben
|
|