MESSAGE
DATE | 2009-01-29 |
FROM | Ron Guerin
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
|
Ronny Abraham wrote: > I think Ruben nailed it when he kicked this off by pointing out that > there was a lack of work on projects. People ultimately take interest > when there is activity. Not so much when it's only speech.
> However, while I'm willing to put in a couple of hours a week on this, > but I'm simply not going to do it if no one else will.
There's certainly a relationship between activity and volunteers and participants. I would warn you though that it's definitely not enough to just have a worthy project. We've tried this several times with the Python Workshop, and as I think Mark Halegua would agree, it hasn't gone very well.
That doesn't mean I don't think it has to not go well. I think however that in order to attract enough people to a given project, we all need to be casting our nets a lot wider in relation to our "advertising" efforts. I think this is a problem in general with Free Software/Linux user groups in the NYC area lately, and it may not be a local problem. The nature of things has changed, but we largely have not. So Ruben may post a NYXLS announcement here and on NYLUG, and the Sulzberger machine will send it off to every other mailing list full of people we more or less already know, and off into the newsgroups where the only people left are people we already know, and I may forward it to a few places full of people we already know. By now you can see where I'm going with this. I don't think our groups have become obsolete, I think our methods of communication have become pretty insular though.
The word I'm looking for I guess is "outreach." There's going to have to be a lot more of that. There's something like 8 million people in this city and that we apparently don't reach enough of them to put 100 people in a room reliably is a failure to reach people. We should be able to announce that we're going to watch paint dry and get 100 people to show up.
- Ron
|
|