MESSAGE
| DATE | 2008-11-02 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] The protection of the GPL
|
Linux.com
Everything Linux and Open Source
Alleged Israeli GPL violation settled out of court
October 27, 2008 (6:00:00 PM) - 5 days, 18 hours ago
By: Bruce Byfield
After two years of litigation, the parties involved in an Israeli law
suit that centered on the validity of the GNU General Public License
(GPL) have settled out of court. The result leaves the legal status of
the GPL in Israel unresolved.
As reported earlier on Linux.com, the case began in early 2006 when
Alexander Rabinovitch, CEO of International Chess University (IchessU)
approached Alexander Maryanovsky, the developer of Jin, a Java-based
chess client, about writing a chess client and server for IchessU. When
Maryanovsky declined, IchessU produced its own software, which
Maryanovsky described as "95% my code and 5% theirs."
When Maryanovsky's attempts to discuss the matter in person with
Rabinovitch were refused, he retained Jonathan J. Klinger, an Israeli
attorney with a familiarity with free and open source licenses and a
member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
In filing the case against Rabinovitch and IchessU, Maryanovsky claimed
that the IchessU software violated the GPL because its copyright refused
to give him credit, and because the client was released with a
proprietary end-user license agreement. In addition, he suggested that
an audio-visual module developed by IchessU was a derivative work, since
it could not compile without his code. Maryanovsky also alleged bad
faith negotiations and copyright violation. He asked for 110,000 NIS
($25,000) in damages -- an amount deliberately kept small so he could
take advantage of a fast-track option that would bring a judgment in 30
days.
Events became complicated because Rabinovitch immigrated to North
America, and could not be served notice in the case. Maryanovsky claimed
that Rabinovitch discussion of the case with Linux.com was proof that he
was aware of the law suit, and filed for default judgment.
However, by this point, Rabinovitch, who earlier showed an inclination
not to take the case seriously, had retained Haim Ravia, an Israeli
lawyer expert in intellectual property law, and was actively defending
himself. By April 2007, Ravia had filed a detailed defense, which
suggested that the case "was submitted in bad faith, and without legal
or factual basis as a mere publicity stunt. As such, the plaintiff has
widely publicized the lawsuit on Internet sites both in Israel and
abroad" -- a reference to Maryanovsky's postings on his Web site and his
interview with Linux.com.
While the defense showed no deep understanding of the GPL, it had the
effect of moving the case out of the fast-track proceedings and into
regular court. At that point, Maryanovsky, Rabinovitch, and their
respective lawyers both stopped talking to the media, and a news
blackout descended on the case for 18 months.
The settlement
News of the settlement finally came in the form of identical
announcements on both the Jin and IchessU sites. The announcement is
short on details, but, since it is described as mutual, it seems clear
that the wording was negotiated between the two parties.
The main focus of the announcement seems to be that both parties went to
extremes in discussing each other in public. IchessU and Rabinovich
state that:
their conduct in relation to the use of Jin personally hurt
Maryanovsky and was against his wishes, and they regret doing so. Mr.
Rabinovich emphasizes that IchessU and himself were acting in good faith
and in accordance to their legal consultation at the time.
For Maryanovksy's part, he acknowledges that:
his actions in response to IchessU and its manager's use of Jin hurt
their business reputation and their name, and he emphasizes that this
was not his aim but he was acting in order to protect what he saw as
infringement of his rights.
The announcement ends by saying "the parties express satisfaction in
ending their dispute and thank their attorneys," and that "the content
of the settlement is kept confidential."
The GPL in the case
Although requested to say what they could, particularly about the
effects that the case might have on the GPL, those involved are keeping
largely silent. Haim Ravia would say only, "Since the parties agreed to
keep the details of the settlement confidential, it will not be
appropriate for me to relate to this case in any way."
Klinger was only slightly more forthcoming. "The settlement was out of
court and therefore does not affect the enforceability of other GPL
claims," he told Linux.com. "The only effect it has is on the parties.
How other parties may see this settlement is another issue. It might
have done some effect on other parties acquaintance with GPL and open
source and might cause more interest in open source projects."
However, despite Klinger's statement, it seems that the GPL emerges
somewhat stronger from the case. Although short, the announcement goes
out of its way to specify that Jin "was licensed under the GNU General
Public Announcement" -- a detail that would seem out of place if the GPL
and its enforceability was not at the heart of the case. Moreover, since
the case lasted 18 months from the time that the defense filed its case,
apparently the GPL was not easily dismissed under Israeli law.
However, the most telling indication of what happened in the case
appears on the IchessU download page. If you click to download, you are
taken to a page that states that the download includes "the IchessU AV
program" and "the third party software known as Jin client for chess
servers," which is copyright by Alexander Maryanovsky. Click on the end
user license agreement, and it turns out to be a standard proprietary
license. Presumably, the license refers either to the IchessU AV program
or the bundle, since the download clearly states that the Jin client is
freely distributable.
The likeliest way to read this information is that IchessU acknowledges
borrowing from Jin, and has come into GPL compliance for the client. In
return, Maryanovsky seems to have agreed to drop his claim that the
audio-visual module is a derivative work. In other words, the validity
of the GPL has apparently been upheld, but at the cost of leaving a
program uninvestigated that may very well be a GPL violation. Although
the question of whether Maryanovsky received any damages remains open,
the news that most interests the free software community seems
reasonably clear.
If these suppositions are valid, then the Jin-IchessU case may have the
same effect in Israel that the cases filed on behalf of BusyBox by the
Software Freedom Law Center have had in the United States. In other
words, although these cases have been settled before a judgment could be
delivered, the fact that defendants chose to settle and come into
compliance creates the impression that the GPL cannot be contested. The
result, with any luck, will be that others will think twice before
others violate the GPL or contest cases that involve it.
If that is so, then the outcome is not as satisfying as a complete
vindication of the GPL would be. All the same, it provides a happy
ending of a sort -- a qualified one, but, for free software supporters,
a happy ending all the same.
Read in the original layout at: http://www.linux.com/feature/151484
--
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://fairuse.nylxs.com DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
"Yeah - I write Free Software...so SUE ME"
"The tremendous problem we face is that we are becoming sharecroppers to our own cultural heritage -- we need the ability to participate in our own society."
"> I'm an engineer. I choose the best tool for the job, politics be damned.<
You must be a stupid engineer then, because politcs and technology have been attached at the hip since the 1st dynasty in Ancient Egypt. I guess you missed that one."
© Copyright for the Digital Millennium
|
|
