MESSAGE
DATE | 2006-04-24 |
FROM | einker
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006
|
From owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Mon Apr 24 18:47:38 2006 Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k3OMlauW028044 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:47:38 -0400 Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k3OMla8b028043 for hangout-outgoings; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:47:36 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to owner-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f Received: from pproxy.gmail.com (pproxy.gmail.com [64.233.166.177]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k3OMlVtT028031 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:47:36 -0400 Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s49so1174789pyc for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:52:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=l3e5aYqmxfdXJYJJMqSKJKipau+Io48mwpecZCpgjfX1Ws/P+sGtdROfSZzPQlqsv5iM6tsHMt45+JwAvsZ401mQJ14YWV9VtB3WSb1GQE/bXHG4eN0vx5RlmnVO6lovHIkdAOnmfC6MdTUW0smq5g3yYuwBDC4XFH0X2ud5he8= Received: by 10.35.88.17 with SMTP id q17mr62358pyl; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.57.16 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8753839c0604241552x5dddf787ufbd4622aa7a286f1-at-mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:52:23 -0400 From: einker To: "Ruben Safir" Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006 Cc: "hangout-mrbrklyn.com" In-Reply-To: <1145911521.18063.10.camel-at-flatbush.mrbrklyn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17803_13280519.1145919143947" References: <7.0.1.0.0.20060424161346.068d3f98-at-dti.net> <1145911521.18063.10.camel-at-flatbush.mrbrklyn.com> Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 7480 Status: RO Content-Length: 5050 Lines: 111
------=_Part_17803_13280519.1145919143947 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
This is very very scary.
On 4/24/06, Ruben Safir wrote: > > With the stupidity of the folks opposed to such legistlation, I see no > reason why it won't fly through Congress. > > Ruben > > On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 16:15 -0400, WWWhatsup wrote: > > [benton] > > > > > > >CHAIRMAN SMITH READIES NEW DIGITAL COPYRIGHT BILL > > >[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Declan McCullagh] > > >For the last few years, a coalition of technology companies, academics > and computer programmers has been trying to persuade Congress to scale ba= ck > the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Now Congress is preparing to do > precisely the opposite. A proposed copyright law would expand the DMCA's > restrictions on software that can bypass copy protections and grant feder= al > police more wiretapping and enforcement powers. The draft legislation, > created by the Bush administration and backed by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), > already enjoys the support of large copyright holders such as the Recordi= ng > Industry Association of America. The 24-page bill is a far-reaching medle= y > of different proposals cobbled together. One would, for instance, create = a > new federal crime of just trying to commit copyright infringement. Such > willful attempts at piracy, even if they fail, could be punished by up to= 10 > years in prison. Rep Smith is the chairman of the U.S. House of > Representatives subcommittee that ov! > ersees intellectual-property law. Rep Smith's press secretary, Terry > Shawn, said Friday that the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006 = is > expected to "be introduced in the near future." > > > > http://news.com.com/Congress+readies+new+digital+copyright+bill/2100-1028= _3-6064016.html?tag=3Dhtml.alert > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > WWWhatsup NYC > > http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >
-- Regards,
Evan M. Inker
------=_Part_17803_13280519.1145919143947 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
This is very very scary.
On 4/24/06, = Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.co= m> wrote:px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">With the stupidity of the folks = opposed to such legistlation, I see no reason why it won't fly through C= ongress.
Ruben
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 16:15 -0400, WWWhatsup wrote: >> [benton] > > > >CHAIRMAN SMITH READIES NEW DIGIT= AL COPYRIGHT BILL > >[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Declan McCul= lagh]
> >For the last few years, a coalition of technology companies, a= cademics and computer programmers has been trying to persuade Congress to s= cale back the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Now Congress is preparing t= o do precisely the opposite. A proposed copyright law would expand the DMCA= 's restrictions on software that can bypass copy protections and grant fede= ral police more wiretapping and enforcement powers. The draft legislation, = created by the Bush administration and backed by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), a= lready enjoys the support of large copyright holders such as the Recording = Industry Association of America. The 24-page bill is a far-reaching medley = of different proposals cobbled together. One would, for instance, create a = new federal crime of just trying to commit copyright infringement. Such wil= lful attempts at piracy, even if they fail, could be punished by up to 10 y= ears in prison. Rep Smith is the chairman of the=20 U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee that ov! ersees intellectual-= property law. Rep Smith's press secretary, Terry Shawn, said Fri= day that the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006 is expected to &q= uot;be introduced in the near future."
> >pyright+bill/2100-1028_3-6064016.html?tag=3Dhtml.alert">http://news.com.com= /Congress+readies+new+digital+copyright+bill/2100-1028_3-6064016.html?tag= =3Dhtml.alert
> > ------------------------------------------------------= --------- > &nbs= p; WWWhatsup NYC > com">http://pinstand.com - http://punkc= ast.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------= - >
-- Re= gards,
Evan M. Inker=20
------=_Part_17803_13280519.1145919143947--
------=_Part_17803_13280519.1145919143947 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
This is very very scary.
On 4/24/06, Ruben Safir wrote: > > With the stupidity of the folks opposed to such legistlation, I see no > reason why it won't fly through Congress. > > Ruben > > On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 16:15 -0400, WWWhatsup wrote: > > [benton] > > > > > > >CHAIRMAN SMITH READIES NEW DIGITAL COPYRIGHT BILL > > >[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Declan McCullagh] > > >For the last few years, a coalition of technology companies, academics > and computer programmers has been trying to persuade Congress to scale ba= ck > the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Now Congress is preparing to do > precisely the opposite. A proposed copyright law would expand the DMCA's > restrictions on software that can bypass copy protections and grant feder= al > police more wiretapping and enforcement powers. The draft legislation, > created by the Bush administration and backed by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), > already enjoys the support of large copyright holders such as the Recordi= ng > Industry Association of America. The 24-page bill is a far-reaching medle= y > of different proposals cobbled together. One would, for instance, create = a > new federal crime of just trying to commit copyright infringement. Such > willful attempts at piracy, even if they fail, could be punished by up to= 10 > years in prison. Rep Smith is the chairman of the U.S. House of > Representatives subcommittee that ov! > ersees intellectual-property law. Rep Smith's press secretary, Terry > Shawn, said Friday that the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006 = is > expected to "be introduced in the near future." > > > > http://news.com.com/Congress+readies+new+digital+copyright+bill/2100-1028= _3-6064016.html?tag=3Dhtml.alert > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > WWWhatsup NYC > > http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >
-- Regards,
Evan M. Inker
------=_Part_17803_13280519.1145919143947 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
This is very very scary.
On 4/24/06, = Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.co= m> wrote:px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">With the stupidity of the folks = opposed to such legistlation, I see no reason why it won't fly through C= ongress.
Ruben
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 16:15 -0400, WWWhatsup wrote: >> [benton] > > > >CHAIRMAN SMITH READIES NEW DIGIT= AL COPYRIGHT BILL > >[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Declan McCul= lagh]
> >For the last few years, a coalition of technology companies, a= cademics and computer programmers has been trying to persuade Congress to s= cale back the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Now Congress is preparing t= o do precisely the opposite. A proposed copyright law would expand the DMCA= 's restrictions on software that can bypass copy protections and grant fede= ral police more wiretapping and enforcement powers. The draft legislation, = created by the Bush administration and backed by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), a= lready enjoys the support of large copyright holders such as the Recording = Industry Association of America. The 24-page bill is a far-reaching medley = of different proposals cobbled together. One would, for instance, create a = new federal crime of just trying to commit copyright infringement. Such wil= lful attempts at piracy, even if they fail, could be punished by up to 10 y= ears in prison. Rep Smith is the chairman of the=20 U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee that ov! ersees intellectual-= property law. Rep Smith's press secretary, Terry Shawn, said Fri= day that the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006 is expected to &q= uot;be introduced in the near future."
> >pyright+bill/2100-1028_3-6064016.html?tag=3Dhtml.alert">http://news.com.com= /Congress+readies+new+digital+copyright+bill/2100-1028_3-6064016.html?tag= =3Dhtml.alert
> > ------------------------------------------------------= --------- > &nbs= p; WWWhatsup NYC > com">http://pinstand.com - http://punkc= ast.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------= - >
-- Re= gards,
Evan M. Inker=20
------=_Part_17803_13280519.1145919143947--
|
|