MESSAGE
| DATE | 2005-03-29 |
| FROM | From: "Inker, Evan"
|
| SUBJECT | RE: [hangout] Weird Useless News
|
> If these families are wasting "everyone's time", what are you doing
> forwarding it to a mailing list?
Maybe you enjoy paying taxes for frivolous court cases to be heard, the
majority of us who work for a living do not.
Just as in the case of hosting the 2012 Olympics is a major waste of city
and state finances, the majority of sane Working NY'ers oppose the venue due
to the fact no city has ever made any net revenue, money or otherwise, from
hosting the Olympics. And as stated above in the subject, "Weird Useless
News", it is exactly that.
And just to clarify a point, I am an animal lover and past owner but do not
feel the need to be one of those weepy
touchy feely people who like to bring litigation over a dog. If you are
stupid enough to give your pet away and then go asking for him/her back
especially after others have footed the medical bills, you deserve what you
get.
Stop forcing local taxpayers to foot the bill for stupidity and childish
behavior.
Regards,
Evan M. Inker
-----Original Message-----
From: Billy [mailto:billy-at-dadadada.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:29 PM
Cc: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Subject: Re: [hangout] Weird Useless News
Inker, Evan wrote:
> Both these families should be taken out back and shot for wasting
> everyone's valuable time and tying up the Court System...And the Dog
> should be turned over to Taco Bell
You obviously don't have an 11-year-old.
If these families are wasting "everyone's time", what are you doing
forwarding it to a mailing list?
I think treating domestic companion animals as livestock misses most of the
emotional value placed on them. My cat is worth nothing in dollars.
Someone deprives me of my cat, he owes me nothing in civil damaages.
Obviously people don't keep cats around because they like to be surrouned by
valuable things in the house. The problem is that the court assigns a
position-neutral value to the object "cat" based on breeding and age, or
whatever. The court SHOULD be determining what the cat is worth TO ME, not
what it's worth to Taco Bell or to the "Free Market". If a chihuahua is
worth $600 (guessing), then it would be irrational to bring it to the vet
for a $1500 operation or to spend $30/month to buy its medicine for 5 years.
Yet people do it.
I'm with the homeless Rocco Fund people on this one.
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
****************************************************************************
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee
you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
This message is provided for informational purposes and should not
be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
GAM operates in many jurisdictions and is
regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required.
****************************************************************************
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|
