MESSAGE
| DATE | 2004-08-31 |
| FROM | Billy
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [hangout] Assembly
|
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:09:31PM -0500, Steve Milo wrote:
>
> No, Jaqueline Jones.
>
> Its not necessarily a windows based class, but using MASM and TASM are
> discussed. The professor talks about using the DOS commandline, if that means
> anything. I think I can get NASM to mimick MASM, but I keep getting an error
> message telling me that I tried to declare a label on a non-label operation
> I read in the NASM documentation that it uses the Amiga style of handling
> lables. Which will not do because I know this professor is strict about the
> code we hand in to her.
I think that if you're restricted by the class in this way, you'd be
best to stick to their tools. I really really like the GNU AT&T asm
notation, and it's even sort of portable across classes of CPUs. If
the class is stuck with TASM, it's using a nonfree assembler from
15 years ago.. Good luck finding a job writing DOS TSRs.
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|
