MESSAGE
| DATE | 2004-05-19 |
| FROM | Adam Kosmin
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [hangout] windows server 2003 vs Linux
|
It depends on your requirements. Personally, my definition of quality
includes that the software must provide the freedoms of the GPL.
Adam
Spidey309-at-aol.com (Spidey309-at-aol.com) wrote:
"
" Hey ruben,
"
" I was just browsing through the specs for windows server 2003 and was wondering if perhaps the may have finally come out with a descent product. Am I wrong or has windows finally come out with a quality product?
"
" -The instigator
" ____________________________
" NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
" Fair Use -
" because it's either fair use or useless....
" NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
"
--
"Yes, Your Honor. Now, where we are so far, in at least my
line of reasoning, is I want to walk the Court through enough of our
complaint to help the Court understand that IBM clearly did contribute a
lot of the Unix-related information into Linux. We just don't know what
it is."
-- Kevin McBride SCO vs. IBM 12/05/03
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|
