MESSAGE
| DATE | 2004-03-09 |
| FROM | From: "Inker, Evan"
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [hangout] XFree86 gets underwhelmed by Linux distro support / Suse 9.1 Due Out
|
XFree86 gets underwhelmed by Linux distro support
Xfree licence controversy breaks wind
http://www.theinquirer.net/Default.aspx?article=14511
By Fernando Cassia: Thursday 04 March 2004, 10:23
SOON AFTER I I wrote about the Xfree86 4.4.0 release, an email from SuSE's
PR department arrived at my inbox, detailing the company's position on the
new Xfree licence. It reads.
SuSE LINUX does not endorse the XFree86 project's recent license
changes.
Hence, SuSE will not include versions of XFree86 subject to the project's modified license in future SUSE product offerings.
SuSE LINUX 9.1, available in April 2004, and the next generation of SUSE
LINUX
Enterprise Server, available in summer 2004, will include an enhanced
version
of X11 based on a XFree86 version prior to the license change.
For the future, we are exploring different options, e.g. X.org and
freedesktop.org, to establish a reliable alternative that lets our customers
benefit from future enhancements in Linux desktop infrastructure technology.
The folks at Sun Microsystems, on the other hand, seem to be still undecided
whether to ditch Xfree86 4.4.0 or stick to it, simply saying: "We are
looking at 4.4 and X.ORG, we have three X platforms Solaris Sparc, Solaris
X86 and the Java Desktop System linux."
Asked what the rejections by distros Red Hat, Mandrake, Debian, and now SuSE
meant for Xfree86's future, project leader David Dawes told The INQUIRER he
is "indifferent to the business decisions of these vendors".
He continued by saying: "I think this provides a good opportunity for
XFree86 to cut out the middle-man, and go back to a stronger emphasis on
providing our software directly to the end user as we did in the early
days."
David Dawes says he "doesn't see anything outrageous" with the new Xfree86
4.4.0 licence. But Linux vendors disagree, and cite two main problems.
the advertising clause which would mean that they would need to add the text
everywhere
that such an "advertising clause" is not GPL compatible, meaning that any
files under the new license cannot be used from a program that is under the
GPL.
But David Dawes seems a little suspicious: "I have heard privately that some
vendors were planning to move to an X.Org release even before this licence
issue came up. That probably makes business sense for the vendors given that
X.Org is a vendor-oriented organization sponsored by hardware and software
companies, while XFree86 is an independent group of volunteer developers. I
suspect that the licence issue may have affected the timing, but not the end
result", he concluded.
In private, however, programmers at some Linux distros that have rejected
the new licence weren't very kind to Xfree86.org. One said: "The XFree86
project is dead, this was just the last shot," conditions of anonymity.
All this cat-fighting is sad indeed, specially since there are some features
in this last Xfree86 update (See here) that are worth having, specially for
notebook users.
We also asked Lindows Inc for an official statement on its position on this
controversy, but so far it has not responded. It must be busy fighting the
Vole's trademark injuctions. But since Lindows is Debian-based, and this
distro has already rejected the Xfree86 4.4.0's licence, that might speak
volumes, quietly.
We will keep you posted as this soup opera unfolds. ยต
****************************************************************************
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee
you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
This message is provided for informational purposes and should not
be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
GAM operates in many jurisdictions and is
regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required.
****************************************************************************
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|
