MESSAGE
| DATE | 2004-03-09 |
| FROM | From: "Inker, Evan"
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [hangout] Study: Open-source databases going mainstream
|
Study: Open-source databases going mainstream
By Stephen Shankland
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
http://news.com.com/2100-7344-5171543.html
Story last modified March 8, 2004, 12:40 PM PST
Following in the footsteps of the Linux operating system, open-source
databases are moving toward mainstream use and threatening proprietary
software alternatives, according to a new survey.
"Open-source databases are in the experimentation phase of the market but
will move to widespread acceptance by 2006," the AMR Research study said.
AMR surveyed 140 information technology managers in December and released
results this month.
The underlying code of open-source software programs can be freely viewed,
modified and redistributed by anyone, a stark contrast to tightly controlled
proprietary software such as databases from Oracle, IBM and Microsoft.
Challenges will come from three contenders in the open-source database
market: MySQL, MaxDB and PostgreSQL, AMR said
Linux threatens proprietary operating systems such as Microsoft's Windows
and Sun Microsystems' Solaris, and databases will follow suit, AMR said.
"The most immediate impact on traditional database vendors will be the
inability to upgrade and upsell customers easily (and profitably) beyond
2006," the report said.
But open-source databases haven't been a guaranteed path to success. One
company, Great Bridge, closed its doors in 2001, after failing to make a
business out of the PostgreSQL package.
And while top Linux seller Red Hat is trying to expand into software beyond
the operating system, it no longer promotes its Red Hat Database, released
in 2001, in its list of Red Hat applications.
But AMR's survey found that open-source databases are now gaining
acceptance. One important factor is lower cost, which has become a major
consideration in database purchasing.
"Of those companies anticipating they would evaluate new database technology
within the next two years, over 40 percent were motivated primarily by
cost," AMR said. Traditional database companies charge as much as $40,000
per server processor for the software; the top price of an open-source
database was $1,500 per processor, for MaxDB.
Support from software companies will help establish open-source databases.
"Although we believe many independent software vendors will announce support
for one open-source database in the next 24 months, we also believe that
there will be a competitive advantage for those taking an aggressive early
road to adoption in the next 12 months," AMR said.
One prominent partnership came with business software powerhouse SAP, which
signed a deal in 2003 with MySQL. Through the deal, MySQL will develop an
open-source database from SAP now called MaxDB and gradually move its
features to the MySQL database product it has sold for years.
Another software partnership came from Sun Microsystems, which embeds within
its directory server software Sleepycat's Berkeley DB. The Berkley DB is an
open-source product that also can be sold as a proprietary package; it's not
designed to replace database software--such as Microsoft's SQL Server, IBM's
DB2 or MySQL--that uses the standard SQL method of requesting information
from a database.
One factor holding back adoption of the new databases is lack of support,
but "much of this concern seemed to come from the false perception that
commercial support contracts were not available," AMR said. The concern
about support "dissipated among those with actual open-source database
experience," AMR added.
Another limiting factor was support for sophisticated sequences of
instructions called stored procedures, AMR said.
Users of open-source databases were more satisfied with the products than
they were with proprietary alternatives, when it came to factors such as
price, performance, ease of administration, stability and current features.
But satisfaction lagged when it came to "scalability," the ability to handle
large workloads, AMR said.
****************************************************************************
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee
you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
This message is provided for informational purposes and should not
be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
GAM operates in many jurisdictions and is
regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required.
****************************************************************************
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|
