MESSAGE
| DATE | 2003-08-29 |
| FROM | Michael Richardson
|
| SUBJECT | RE: [hangout] No plans to sue Linux companies, says SCO
|
Is this a rethink on SCO's part?
-----Original Message-----
From: Inker, Evan [mailto:EInker-at-gam.com]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:52 PM
To: 'hangout-at-nylxs.com'
Subject: [hangout] No plans to sue Linux companies, says SCO
No plans to sue Linux companies, says SCO
By Sam Varghese
August 29, 2003
The SCO Group said today it had never planned to sue any Linux companies,
had no concrete plans to sue anyone and also no current plans to take a
commercial Linux customer to court.
The company was responding to questions routed through its PR people in
Sydney.
As the Canopy Group, which has a stake in SCO, also has interests in several
other Linux companies, SCO was asked whether it planned to sue all these
companies. The answer was "No. SCO has never planned to sue Linux
companies."
In June, SCO senior vice-president Chris Sontag was quoted as saying the
company would either will file a new suit or amend its lawsuit against IBM
to target other companies which SCO alleges are illegally appropriating its
Unix source code.
Today SCO also said it had no current plans to take a commercial Linux
customer to court.
Earlier this year the company issued a letter to commercial Linux users
threatening them with legal action.
Among the companies in which Canopy is involved is Linux Networx, which has
supplied a supercomputer to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory;
asked whether SCO would sue the laboratory, the company spokesperson said:
"No. SCO has never made concrete plans to sue anyone."
In a statement made on August 20, SCO chief executive officer Darl McBride
said the company was identifying Linux users for possible litigation.
In March, SCO filed a billion-dollar lawsuit against IBM, for
"misappropriation of trade secrets, tortious interference, unfair
competition and breach of contract."
SCO also claimed that Linux was an unauthorised derivative of Unix and
warned commercial Linux users that they could be legally liable for
violation of intellectual copyright. SCO later expanded its claims against
IBM to US$3 billion in June when it said it was withdrawing IBM's licence
for its own Unix, AIX.
This story was found at:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/08/29/1062050642514.html
****************************************************************************
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee
you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
This message is provided for informational purposes and should not
be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
GAM operates in many jurisdictions and is
regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required.
****************************************************************************
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|
