MESSAGE
DATE | 2003-07-02 |
FROM | Mike Richardson - NYLXS VICE PRESIDENT
|
SUBJECT | Subject: [hangout] [Fwd: [wwwac] MS 'owns' the Web?] (fwd)
|
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: 02 Jul 2003 06:32:54 -0400 From: Michael L Richardson To: Michael L Richardson Subject: [Fwd: [wwwac] MS 'owns' the Web?]
-----Forwarded Message-----
> From: Chris Kaminski > To: WWWAC > Subject: [wwwac] MS 'owns' the Web? > Date: 02 Jul 2003 12:19:53 +0200 > > From Dave Winer: > > When Microsoft took over the browser market, they turned all > Web developers into Microsoft developers. It was one of the > most selfish acts ever in the software business. > > But it didn't happen in a vacuum. In order for it to work, > Netscape had to completely miss the developer opportunity. > Instead of serving people who built websites and coded in > HTML, their natural constituency, they courted C developers > (with Java), who were strongly connected to Microsoft -- > and stranded Web developers without a leader, with Microsoft. > > Now Microsoft is like the US in Vietnam, except they won. > They have no business here, they don't understand the Web, > they're an occupying force. The sad thing is that Microsoft > is now clearly foreclosing the Web, they're not upgrading > the browser, they're not fixing bugs, they simply don't > care about the Web. If they tell you they do, tell them > actions speak louder, and their lack of action speaks loudest. > > > > > I think he's a bit pessimistic--it is still possible to build websites > that are vendor-neutral, but as time goes on that may not be the case. > Already, one must pay for an MSN subscription if one wants to test on > the latest version of IE for the Mac (it's integrated into MSN). You > already need multiple Windows licenses to (legally) test multiple > versions of IE. Both of these differ from Safari insofar as Safari's > engine is Open Source, and so can be approximated using Konqueror on > Linux or OmniWeb 4.5 on OS X. > > Note: Winer a vested interest in deemphasizing the Web: RSS is his > baby, and it provides an alternate mode of browsing content sites. > > I dunno. Does MS own the Web? It doesn't look good, and it looks very > much like they're making the same moves in the media player space. > Real's days are probably numbered. > > I'm having trouble being terribly optimistic, especially in the light > of this: > > Netscape Founder Says Web Browsing Innovation Dead > > [Yahoo.com] > > nm/20030701/wr_nm/tech_internet_andreessen_dc> [direct link] > > I'm not so much concerned by Andreeson's comments (not at all concerned > by them, actually) as by this: > > Microsoft ultimately won the war as Microsoft's IE is now > used by more than 90 percent of the Web surfing population. > > No mention that they won their share through tactics that were found to > have violated antitrust law. > > They got their browser share in part through tactics that were found to > be illegal in a U.S. court of law (and AFAIK the EU is still > investigating them). Now they're cashing in and outside of Winer, Dori > Smith[1], Ben Henick[2], the WaSP[3] and a handful of others[4], > nobody's saying boo about it. None of the mainstream press coverage has > so much as mentioned the significance of MS's moves--that they're > consolidating illegally-obtained market power. > > That makes me sad. And worried. > > > -- > chris.kaminski = ( design | code ) { http://www.setmajer.com } > > [1] > [2] > [3] > [4] (scroll > down for list of links) > > > > ## The World Wide Web Artists' Consortium --- http://www.wwwac.org/ ## > ## To Unsubscribe, send an e-mail to: wwwac-unsubscribe-at-lists.wwwac.org ## > > > e
____________________________ NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene Fair Use - because it's either fair use or useless.... NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|