MESSAGE
DATE | 2003-05-17 |
FROM | Ruben I Safir
|
SUBJECT | Subject: [hangout] DVD Software takes a legal blow vs DMCA
|
The World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service
Legal blow for DVD-copying software 12:54 16 May 03 NewScientist.com news service
Companies selling DVD-copying software received a legal blow on Thursday when a judge hearing Hollywood's case against one firm said she is "substantially persuaded" by previous cases that the software violates the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
The case against 321 Studios is being heard in San Francisco by District Judge Susan Ilston, who said she aims to make her ruling quickly. A consortium of movie studies, including MGM, Tristar, Columbia, Disney and Universal, want an injunction to bar 321 from selling its product.
The software enables people to make perfect digital copies of films. The movie studios argue this permits illegal copies to be made and circulated, infringing their copyright. 321 says the software allows people to make back-up copies of DVDs they have already paid for, and want the case to go to trial.
A request for an injunction against five other software companies has been filed in New York by the Paramount and 20th Century Fox movie studios. Industry observers have said that these cases could make or break the controversial 1998 DCMA legislation, which aims to stop people breaking copy protection technologies.
After Thursday's partial summary judgement, Marta Grutka, a spokeswoman for the Motion Picture Association of America said: "We think this is an open and shut case." Rob Semaan, 321's Chief Executive admitted being "a little bit discouraged" by the judge's statement, but said he thought the arguments set out by his lawyers were convincing.
Compressed code
321 has been selling its DVD Xcopy software since the end of 2002, for $100. It allows a DVD movie disc to be copied to a blank DVD, even though the compressed MPEG code on the disc is usually digitally encrypted using the Content Scrambling System. CSS makes conventional copies unplayable.
But Xcopy does not hack the CSS protection, which would explicitly break copyright laws. Instead it uses a conventional DVD ROM player to unscramble the MPEG code for legitimate playback, and then sends it to a temporary cache file on the PC's hard drive. From there Xcopy copies the unscrambled MPEG code onto a blank DVD using a conventional DVD burner.
The software has had a major disadvantage. Most movie DVDs are pressed on dual layer discs with about 9 GB capacity, while blank DVDs have only 4.7 GB capacity. So PC users need to span a DVD9 movie over two blanks.
However, the latest version of Xcopy, released just a week before the latest court hearing, overcomes this problem. Extra compression is used on the MPEG code as it is cached, so that the entire movie can be burned onto a single blank DVD. More on this story
Related Stories Court to rule on software that copies 'protected' DVDs 7 December 2002 Ultra-high resolution DVDs are unprotected 8 November 2002 Tiny optical disc could store five movies 18 October 2002 For more related stories search the print edition Archive
Weblinks 321 Studios Motion Picture Association of America Electronic Freedom Foundation Protect Fair Use campaign
"Fragile and easily damaged"
The legal arguments filed by 321 fill 50 pages. They claim "DVDs are fragile and easily damaged," and that movie studios "require customers who scratch a disc or experience degradation to purchase a replacement at full cost". This, argues 321, is why "fair use" should allow people to make personal "back up" copies of DVDs. The latest Xcopy software requires the user to click a declaration that the original movie is not borrowed or hired.
In a possible glimmer of hope for 321, Judge Ilston was clearly troubled by one legal point. If the DCMA stops people circumventing all copy protection, what will happen in the future when copyright on a movie expires, but the discs are still protected?
Wendy Seltzer, staff attorney for the digital rights pressure group, the Electronic Freedom Foundation, said: "Fair use and the DMCA have been on a collision course since 1998. The judge's ruling in this case will tell whether fair use survives the crash."
Barry Fox and Damian Carrington
-- __________________________ Brooklyn Linux Solutions __________________________ DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS http://fairuse.nylxs.com
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Consulting http://www.inns.net <-- Happy Clients http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive or stories and articles from around the net http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/downtown.html - See the New Downtown Brooklyn....
1-718-382-0585 ____________________________ NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene Fair Use - because it's either fair use or useless.... NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|