MESSAGE
DATE | 2003-05-23 |
FROM | Michael Richardson
|
SUBJECT | RE: [hangout] Big Business & World Perceptions - Linux on the Des ktop
|
First thing those in the Free and Open Source community have to stop saying "Linux is not ready for the desktop". STOP SAYING THAT!!!. Most of the people won't know if you don't keep saying it. M$ is not ready for the desktop (it keeps crashing). But they don't keep that in the buyer's face. Look at where they are at.
-----Original Message----- From: Inker, Evan [mailto:EInker-at-gam.com] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 10:01 AM To: 'hangout-at-nylxs.com' Subject: [hangout] Big Business & World Perceptions - Linux on the Desktop
Linux lags on the desktop Jennifer Maselli, InformationWeek Friday, 11 April 2003
Associates at Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp.'s more than 330 stores have used Linux-based point-of-sale systems, inventory applications, and gift registries for more than two years. But CIO Michael Prince drew the line at desktops in the company's headquarters: Linux wasn't ready, for a slew of technical reasons.
Until now. A lot has changed in the last six months, Prince says. Support from key vendors and advancements in the compatibility of Linux software gave him reason to put StarOffice, Sun Microsystems' desktop software suite that runs on Linux and other operating systems, on 300 office PCs. He uses it himself. But here's the catch: The corporate PCs still run Microsoft's Windows, and Prince hasn't abandoned Microsoft Office. He wants Burlington office staff to have the same applications as the retail stores, but he doesn't yet think a corporate transition to Linux on the desktop is worth the trouble of migrating existing data and retraining employees.
Linux looks increasingly like a technically viable option as an operating system for PCs, but it's still one that's rarely considered seriously in business environments. That's despite wide use of the open-source system in many companies' IT infrastructures: Research firm IDC says Linux has 14% of the US$50.9 billion market for server operating systems and will climb to No. 2 behind Windows by 2006. Replacing server software and training IT staff to use Linux is one thing; getting knowledge workers to use a new system makes even the several-hundred-dollar savings between the Microsoft Office productivity suite and a Linux suite such as StarOffice not enough for most IT execs. "They're not willing to make a change from Microsoft when the Windows software is handling their needs and users are comfortable with it," says Nicholas Petreley, an analyst for research company Evans Data.
Linux on the desktop is confined mostly to workstations that rely heavily on graphics for digital-content creation and product engineering, says Jim McDonnell, senior VP of marketing for Hewlett-Packard's personal systems group. "This makes sense because it's taking advantage of the operating system for performance," he says. But vendors haven't given up trying. Sun's latest low-cost Linux PC, slated to ship this summer, could spur wider use of the system on desktops, says Bill Claybrook, research director for Linux and open source at the Aberdeen Group. "Linux hasn't made a dent in the desktop marketplace so far, but things will change," he predicts.
Other changes are under way. Oracle said last month it will offer technical support to customers using open-source software from the UnitedLinux consortium. In February, CodeWeavers Inc. and Tarantella Inc. started bundling together Tarantella's Enterprise 3 access software with CodeWeavers' CrossOver Office Server Edition, to let users access Office applications from a client running Linux via a Java-enabled Web browser. Also, Ximian Inc., a maker of Linux-based desktop-productivity applications, says a version of its software, to be released this spring, will tightly integrate with Windows.
The technical barriers are steadily falling away, Burlington's Prince says. Many of the company's applications have been loaded using Oracle's toolsets, and IT workers at Burlington use those same Oracle toolsets to do development work. Until recently, the toolset used to develop and deploy the applications required a special version of Java called Oracle J-Initiator, and up until a few months ago it had been available only on Windows. Oracle teamed with Sun to add Linux support, Prince says. Still, some of the company's older Oracle applications aren't Linux-compatible.
StarOffice 6.0 can open Microsoft Word and Excel documents, removing one of the most annoying problems of the past, Prince says. By deploying both StarOffice and Windows on corporate PCs, he hopes to ease any eventual transition to Linux. Still, a migration is a migration, so Prince isn't making a major operating system or productivity-suite change right now. "I'm not sure there's any payback in migrating people," he says. "Cost-wise, Linux is better, and it's more reliable, but migrating users one-by-one is a big effort." Prince will encourage new employees to use Linux instead of Windows, but he won't force them. "We want people to use what they're comfortable with," he says.
Linux still has shortcomings. Rory Hudson, retail systems manager for Zumiez Inc., a retailer with 100 stores, deployed PCs running Linux in stores so managers can access a company intranet and Linux-based E-mail and spreadsheets for financial reporting. But he's keeping Windows at headquarters to do some of the company's more-complicated PC-based work. "We wouldn't consider switching off of Windows, because we have advanced spreadsheets and Excel handles those really well," Hudson says. "We've found a really good niche for each operating system." That includes Apple Macintoshes for the company's graphic designers.
Aberdeen analyst Claybrook has his own Linux experience. He dabbled with the open-source system on his desktop but dropped it because some document formatting was lost when files were sent to a Windows machine. "We have a specific format that we need to follow when we send reports, so I couldn't afford those discrepancies," Claybrook says. Laptop users also face challenges. "Laptops are tougher to run Linux [on] because they've got more proprietary devices, and not very many are designed for Linux," Prince says. "It's doable, but it's a lot of work."
Some business-technology executives are just getting comfortable with running Linux on their servers, where it has something of a track record for value and performance; Linux on the desktop isn't even in the planning stages. PNC Bank is evaluating whether to move some servers to Linux and plans a limited test this year. The bank is confident it can lower costs and increase performance using Linux. But it isn't even considering a desktop change. "We don't really have a need for faster performance at the desktop level, so there's not the same push to evaluate Linux on the desktop," a spokeswoman says.
For those who choose to take the plunge, however, there are savings to be had. Zumiez's Hudson says that running either Windows or Unix on point-of-sale computers in all stores would have cost about US$1,000 per store. Zumiez went with free Linux systems for the 19 stores it opened last year. Sun's StarOffice suite lists at US$50 per machine for 125 users, to US$25 for 10,000; that compares with an average price of about US$400 for Office.
Ernie Ball Inc. turned to Linux out of crisis more than cost savings. Three years ago, the global manufacturer of guitar strings was slammed by the Business Software Alliance for running more copies of Windows than the company had paid for. Then there were the pirated copies of software from Autodesk Inc. and FileMaker Inc. It was the spark that turned Ernie Ball into a Linux hot spot. "We had 120 days to comply with the BSA, and we complied by throwing everything out," says Jeff Whitmore, an IT manager at Ernie Ball.
The company operates almost all of its business on open-source software, including Red Hat Linux on its desktops and servers, StarOffice on PCs, and E-mail from Ximian. Whitmore says the company spent about US$20,000 to make the switch and cut US$80,000 to US$100,000 a year from its IT budget. With a little more than 70 users, the IT staff handled training on the fly. "There wasn't a lot of training involved, and we just handled questions from users as they popped up," he says.
For now, Microsoft commands more than 90% of the desktop market, and most users seem comfortable with what its productivity apps cost for what they deliver. With its upcoming Office suite, Microsoft will try to pull further ahead of competitors. That leaves only a little wiggle room for Linux, as it battles the inertia of an installed base.
Regards,
Evan
**************************************************************************** This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments. GAM operates in many jurisdictions and is regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required. ****************************************************************************
____________________________ NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene Fair Use - because it's either fair use or useless.... NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc ____________________________ NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene Fair Use - because it's either fair use or useless.... NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|