MESSAGE
| DATE | 2003-02-19 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [hangout] Propose a resolution/board meeting on Monday
|
That's a question we've never approached.
I'd have to look at the charter. Generally, the President has called
meetings. I think before we should agree to this in any event, it
should take a board vote on the issue, especially if there is a large
degree of decent in the board.
Hushing the other side is not the issue, IMO. I really don't want
to give them a stage to scure the issues more, and they've been offered to
present to the board when they were asked to.
I'd say an OPEN meeting, such as one at KR, is out of the question.
At mot they can send 2 presentitives to present their case to the board.
I just got off the Phone with Joe Maffia, he's suggesting an alternative
which I would agree with. He would allow them to present to the board in
Private at R&M if they are willing to hold to binding arbitration on this
matter.
In terms of giving them a stage for free, with no responsibity on their side
I deeply oppose that. And I think so would the board. I'm not interested
in a farkus with Brett packing a room full of strangers, and Jay jumping around
like a chicken. It would have to be a closed, procedural meeting with a goal.
BTW, having them speak is not going to help bring a resoltion.
You'd have to convince me that this would be the case. Remember,
this is the same person who decided to have the conversation on
speakerphone about the class with the class present in order dredge
an internal matter of the classes to the students.
I'm not willing to give them a stage without assurances of retrieving the
domain.
Ruben
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:15:14AM -0500, Marco Scoffier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:44:33AM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > No
> >
> > There will only be a meeting for them to hand over NYLXS.org
> >
> > There banded at this point.
> >
> > Ruben
> >
> >
>
> Can you deny the board such a meeting?
>
> As far as I can tell Evan Inker, Vin, Joe Grastara and myself are in
> favor of such a meeting. I am happy that finally there are some other
> voices on this.
>
> Of course we would need a moderator and an assurance on both sides to
> accept the results of such a meeting.
>
> I cannot understand how hushing the other side can possibly bring about
> a resolution.
>
>
> --Marco
--
__________________________
Brooklyn Linux Solutions
__________________________
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS http://fairuse.nylxs.com
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Consulting
http://www.inns.net <-- Happy Clients
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive or stories and articles from around the net
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/downtown.html - See the New Downtown Brooklyn....
1-718-382-0585
____________________________
New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
|
|
