MESSAGE
DATE | 2003-02-11 |
FROM | Dave Williams
|
SUBJECT | Re: [hangout] Re: eGovOS conference in D.C.
|
Fair enough. I guess that the heart of the issue is the fact that Mr. Stanco isn't actually running an advocacy event, just something that looks a lot like one. Of course there will be plenty of people who get a lot of value out of it, regardless.
I sympathize with the frustration people feel when they commit to a movement that is so amenable to misinterpretation and revision. Not to mention so difficult to adequately fund or represent! Maybe I should look at the big picture and be thankful that it is making any inroads at all.
Still, I think there is a lot of hubris involved when people start toying around with large predatory monopolies. If you spend a lot of time in the rarefied air of DC you could get an inflated opinion of your political skills, and if people don't realize that MS has a culture of competition and victory-at-all-costs by this point they are asking for trouble. The fallout of such self-indulgent miscalculations won't be pretty.
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:04, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > I agree that this vigilance is necessary and must happen. However, it is > my personal belief that showing up at an event, and being a respectful > participant, to speak about how our dedication to those principles and how > Matusow and others work against them is precisely the way to be vigilant. > > Stanco doesn't run advocacy events anymore. That's upsetting and > disheartening. But it's reality. Given that reality, we should use these > "both sides allowed" events he now does run to get our vigilance across to > as many people as we can. > > If someone gives you a pulpit to spread your beliefs, use it! > > -- bkuhn (speaking for himself, not his employer)
____________________________ New Yorker Free Software Users Scene Fair Use - because it's either fair use or useless....
|
|