MESSAGE
DATE | 2003-02-06 |
FROM | David Sugar
|
SUBJECT | Subject: [hangout] Re: eGovOS conference in D.C.; I'm not attending that
|
On Thursday 06 February 2003 17:35, Derek Neighbors wrote: > David Sugar said: > > I did not specifically suggest this event should be "boycotted" or that > > I have called for any form of "boycott", so please do not imply this; I > > mealy stated that I chose to not attend it. However, I tend to think > > people of conscious will likely make the same choice and certainly > > people are free to make up their own minds. > > I worded myself poorly. Two clarifications. > > 1. I do not necessarily believe events calling things Open Source should > be avoided like the plague. I think the benefit vs harm needs to be > weighed on a case by case basis. This particular event my gripe is that > they are lumping "shared source" into the "open source" category, which is > extremely damaging.
Yes, extremely. I also interpreted it in this way and I am glad we both see this the exact same way.
> 2. I accidently through poor choice of words, implied that David was > boycotting this event. When what I should have made clear was that David > was making a good choice by avoiding this event (imho), but that I would > recommend that GNUe as a whole boycott (avoid) it. > > -Derek
I am not suggesting a boycott is nessisarly a bad idea either, just that I had not proposed one :). I think it would be useful to hear from a few more people before calling for such a boycott, however. Bradley would have been a good choice to hear from, but unfortunately he is away until the middle of Febuary.
____________________________ New Yorker Free Software Users Scene Fair Use - because it's either fair use or useless....
|
|