MESSAGE
DATE | 2002-05-28 |
FROM | From: "Brendan W. McAdams"
|
SUBJECT | Re: [hangout] Roadrunner Service
|
Comcast/-at-HOME allegedly 'lock to mac' as well but I've never had anyone from comcast / -at-home take down my MAC address ever, or lock to it.
When my firewall had hardware issues I simply plugged one of my other machines in.
What comcast is doing now is providing modems that have their own physical addressability.
If you use a different modem than the one they provide you, supposedly it can be detected.
On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 11:31, Vin wrote: > Perhaps they didn't change the mac address on the Linksys to spoof their lan > card, but if they didn't, they wouldn't be able to access the service, as rr > locks to the mac address of the lan card. The only way this would be > possible is if they opted for a self-install and connected with the Linksys > from the beginning, then there would be no need to spoof the lan mac address. > If they used a time warner tech to install, the time warner tech wouldn't > connect the Linksys under most circumstances. This then locks the mac > address of the lan card to the service. If a linksys is later connected, it > would be mandatory to spoof the lan card mac address, thereby removing the > linksys mac address. I believe that this is how most roadrunner linksys > connections are made. They are still able to detect this somehow. > > http://www.rocketguy.com/rocket.html > > http://www.practicallynetworked.com/sharing/uselinux.htm > > http://www.vortech.net/rrlinux/ > > On Tuesday 28 May 2002 11:18, Brendan W. McAdams wrote: > > Easy to determine if you have a linksys: MAC address of remote machine. > > > > Remember, all companies have a MAC subset assigned to them that > > identifies their company. And typically they add a few numbers that > > identify the individual product. And then your individual unit. > > > > They probably look for linksys routers specifically. > > > > And NATted packets do leave a paper trail; its possible to pick them up. > > > > Broadband service these days sucks; Comcast pisses me off although I > > haven't had any problems so far with them or -at-home and my firewall > > (Custom BSD Setup with standard NICs in them)... the TOS is ridiculous. > > > > On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 10:59, Vin wrote: > > > Note that Roadrunner's residential TOS do not allow you to connect a > > > "server" to the service, nor do they allow you to connect more than one > > > computer unless you are paying for each computer connected. > > > > > > They also block server ports such as port 80 from time to time. I > > > believe they also disconnect service simply for having port 80 or other > > > server ports open. I remember reports of them blocking server ports > > > during some virus outbreaks (code red, etc.) They regularly probe their > > > subscribers' computers for unnapproved services/ports. The guy from > > > digital duo covered this in an article concerning software firewalls > > > about a year ago. > > > > > > Their commercial/business service is set up differently, but much more > > > expensive. > > > > > > Their have also been some reports of service disconnections for simply > > > having a linksys router connected to the service. I have a linksys > > > router connected to one of my IP addresses on my main switch, and I don't > > > know how they can do it because the router hides all ports (I'm not > > > running any servers on that IP address though). Maybe the router was > > > misconfigured, or ports were left open to run a service. The linksys > > > router is good for Roadrunner in that it can spoof the mac address, which > > > is how RR locks one computer to the service, by the mac address of the > > > lan card. Of course the info on the linksys router is useless if you are > > > routing/firewalling with Linux. > > > > > > Either dslreports.com or another site has extensive info on roadrunner > > > (and other services). I forget the name of the other site, but it is a > > > site that does reports on switches, hubs, routers, and networking. When > > > I remember the name of the site (or I'm in front of the computer where > > > the site is bookmarked) I'll post it. > > > > > > Vincenzo. > > > > > > On Tuesday 28 May 2002 09:42, jonathan wrote: > > > > the dhcp at roadrunner (at least time/warner's version) > > > > is, for the most part a static address for which you occasionally have > > > > to renew the lease.the address almost never changes. > > > > for any public site, i use dynamic dns (dh.org) as the primary > > > > nameserver, so if the address does change, the nameserver can implement > > > > the change within two minutes or so. (you can set the communications to > > > > the dynamic dns server to be automatic with some of the dynamic dns > > > > providers) > > > > some of the cable/dsl "routers" will also let you set up automatic > > > > communication with a dynamic dns server as well as let you spoof the > > > > "router's" mac address. > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 09:13, Ruben I Safir wrote: > > > > > Is anyone using Roadrunner service for broad band, > > > > > and how can one set up an internal network with the > > > > > IP address switching through the DHCP service? > > > > > > > > > > Ruben
____________________________ New Yorker Linux Users Scene Fair Use - because it's either fair use or useless....
|
|