MESSAGE
DATE | 2001-12-08 |
FROM | marco
|
SUBJECT | Re: [hangout] Committee or Good Project
|
> We need to have like an Artists committee to take an inventory of > what is available, and to start to work with the tools, to do real > work, and promote the fact.
I would love to participate in the development of a series of lecture/demonstrations/live tutorials for the end user of creative products already available under Linux. I would hope these could be instrumental in promoting the present sexyness of Linux(1) and in getting more people excited about using free software. Everyone has their own reasons for first wanting to get involoved and often the reason is a peice of software be it the OS, the server, the firewall, or some application.
Linux right now is a very attractive platform for the creative person, and there is already so much good mature software, the promotion of this fact seems to me as crutial as working to fill in the certain pieces in the software and compatibility map which are missing. I don't think the free software world should be the slightest bit embarassed as to where it stands in respect to the huge commercial applications, but this view has to be known. Too often linux is dismissed on the, "oh the gimp can't do CMYK, or know about AdobeRGB colorsapce, it's not as good."(2) I say it's different and often better, someone should consentrate on the positive aspects and these positive facts could be demoed. Of course most people using linux have had to fight through hours of installation and information gathering on their own, but the whole point would be to get more people excited and involved (turned on ? :)). Before even coming to an installfest someone could get an image of what they can expect and ultimately why they would want Linux at home or in their company. Each demo would also introduce people to the issues surrounding opensource (gif, video codecs, hardware coompatibility, etc.)
Possible sexy subjects could include:
--Perl + Gimp is a very powerful tool no matter on which side of the computing world you reside. Couldn't a demo on creating animated gifs in the gimp turn someone on to using Linux in the first place? and a little script-fu or perl scipting seal the deal?
--I have some experience with 3d modeling, rendering and motion graphics under Linux,(using a mixture of free and open source tools). Blender (not open-source but free as in you don't have to pay) is reason enough for some one to want to install linux at home. I can frankly say anyone even contimplating spending the money on one of the commercial 3d applications is crazy not to at least check out what is availble for free under linux. There are an amazing number of strong tools.
--The list of audio applications and tools is also incredible, just name what you want to do. The computer music world has been developing under unix for years (something about the mathematicians liking bach and going to composition school and learning to program). I could come up with some cool demos
--Often a creative project using free software has to use multiple tools. Graphics or multimedia people are trained in art school to use macromedia's, digidesign's or adobe's killer apps. They get turned off by what seems to be the confusion of multiple small tools.(3) I think it would be crutial in these demos to walk a project from begining to end. It is possible to make pdfs using linux right now. The chain of small tools necessary can be daunting, but easily demonstratable by a knowledgeable person. There is a debate to be had on what subjects deserve live presentation, and which are best demostrated on a webpage.
Two important links I assume many of you already know: http://www.linuxartist.org and http://www.bright.net/~dlphilp/linuxsound/ .
Looking forward to your thoughts,
Marco
PS I footnoted some stuff cause this was getting really long, sorry if I ramble.
(1) Sexyness is crutially important in driving people's desires. Sexiness in computers is power and ease (or as the commercial OS and software vendors have known for years, the illusion of power and ease). There is little wonder why the largest computer graphics houses are using Linux render farms on the back end to create the graphics for the biggest Hollywood movies. What most people don't realize is that you can have a largely indentical set of front end tools at home also for free.
(2) Another problem for professionals with the gimp is the color space issue. It seems totally insane, but as I understand it, the gamma values for the individual colors in say Adobe RGB are treated as industry secrets. You can already change these values for an image in the gimp, thus you have the ability to match any colorspace, but you just can't know exactly what values Adobe uses. By staying in sRGB (s for standard?), on my macs, I feel I have resolved most problems. Another case of companies convincing the end user that certain things are incredibly complicated when in reality they are just hiding standards. projected etc. here>
(3) I think many people using macs unfortunately think of free software as tiny little apps that don't do much but risk creating dreaded extention conflicts with their several hundred dollar adobe or macro media packages in the ever precarious system folder (lets not even talk about the horrible response OSX's interface has gotten from the creative mac user community).
Linux on Mac also borrows some of that platform's sex appeal. I used to live in DC. Very active in the LUGs there is a man named Billy Ball who wrote some of the Linux Unleashed books and who would bring macs loaded with linux to every public appearance of the dc area LUGS. There was no greater head turner than his cube or his imac running free software. I brought my titanium running yellow dog to Ruben's last installfest but didn't get to show it off ;)
____________________________ New Yorker Linux Users Scene Fair Use - because it's either fair use or useless....
|
|