MESSAGE
DATE | 2001-10-08 |
FROM | Jay Sulzberger
|
SUBJECT | Re: [hangout] billy's key redux.
|
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, j. ercole wrote:
> Thus spake Billy (billy-at-dadadada.net): > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 02:58:51PM -0400, j. ercole wrote: > > > Billy, are you able to encrypt to yourself now? I'm still getting > > > errors. > > > > Yes, I can encrypt to myself now. > > > > > See below. > > > > > > Billy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > I've updated (added to) my key. To get the new jive: > > > > > > > > > > gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0219745D > > > > > > > > ercole-at-bigbox:~$ gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0219745D > > > > gpg: requesting key 0219745D from wwwkeys.pgp.net ... > > > > gpg: key 0219745D: invalid subkey binding > > > > gpg: key 0219745D: not changed > > > > gpg: Total number processed: 1 > > > > gpg: unchanged: 1 > > > > ercole-at-bigbox:~$ gpg --list-keys | grep billy > > > > pub 1024D/0219745D 2000-04-21 Billy Donahue > > > > uid Billy Donahue > > > > uid Billy Donahue > > > > uid Billy Donahue > > > > ercole-at-bigbox:~$ gpg -e -r 0219745D ENCRYPT_me_to_billy > > > > gpg: 0219745D: skipped: unusable public key > > > > gpg: ENCRYPT_me_to_billy: encryption failed: unusable public key > > > > This is what I get: > > > > billy-at-purple:billy$ gpg --list-keys billy-at-dadadada.net > > pub 1024D/0219745D 2000-04-21 Billy Donahue > > uid [revoked] Billy Donahue > > uid [revoked] Billy Donahue > > uid [revoked] Billy Donahue > > sub 1024g/A321F6EA 2000-04-21 [expires: 2001-04-21] > > sub 1024D/F68A3B59 2001-04-27 [expires: 2002-04-27] > > sub 1024g/2E61BC37 2001-10-07 [expires: 2002-10-07] > > > > Try this key..... > > I get matching output now, I've been able to encrypt to you from the > command line. > > > Let me try encrypting one to you from mutt. > > > Thanks, Billy, > > j.
Where is Billy's new public key?
oo--JS.
____________________________ New Yorker Linux Users Scene Fair Use - because it's either fair use or useless....
|
|